Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 952 Public Summary

119-HR-952 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 952 Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act

park Public Lands and Natural Resources
Reversionary Interest Conveyance ActThis bill directs the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to offer to sell the reversionary interest of the United States in approximately 8.43 acres of land in...

A narrow, technical bill that lets current parcel owners in Sacramento buy the federal government’s old “reversionary” claim on about 8.43 acres at fair market value, with buyers covering all costs; it passed the House by voice vote on May 13, 2025 and had a Senate subcommittee hearing on February 12, 2026.

Published
13 Feb 2026
Updated
13 Feb 2026
Tags
public-summary · US-Congress · land
Unvetted
01 · Section

Public Summary: 119-HR-952 — Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act

Headline Summary: Clears up old federal claims on a small stretch of land in Sacramento so current property owners can hold clear title—sold at fair market value, with buyers paying all fees.

What It Does: The bill tells the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management to sell the federal government’s “reversionary interest” in about 8.43 acres in Sacramento to the current parcel owners. In plain English: it removes a lingering federal claim tied to historic railroad grants, so titles are clean. The sale must be for at least fair market value, based on standard federal appraisal rules, and the buyers must also pay all related costs (surveys, appraisals, and administration). Proceeds go into the Federal Land Disposal Account for future land-conservation transactions. The legislation also preserves an existing railroad right‑of‑way width and makes clear it doesn’t validate claims based on adverse possession.

Acreage affected
8.43acres
Minimum railroad right-of-way preserved
50feet each side of track centerline
Deadline for Interior to offer sale after a valid request
2years
Sale price
0At least fair market value (per federal appraisal standards)
Buyer responsibility for transaction costs
100percent
Where the money goes
1Federal Land Disposal Account

Who’s For It:

  • House members in both parties—evidenced by passage under suspension of the rules and a voice vote on May 13, 2025—framing it as a routine, noncontroversial land‑title fix.
  • Supporters argue it provides certainty for property owners and local planning while ensuring taxpayers are paid fair market value and don’t bear administrative costs.

Who’s Against It:

  • No formal opposition was recorded during House passage.
  • Potential critiques you might hear in similar cases: concern about setting a precedent for releasing federal interests too easily; questions about whether appraisals capture full market value; and a preference for keeping federal leverage for transportation or public‑use planning.

What’s Next: The bill was received in the Senate on May 14, 2025 and referred to the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining held a hearing on February 12, 2026. Next steps could include a subcommittee or full‑committee markup, a Senate floor vote, and—if passed—submission to the President. If the Senate amends it, the two chambers would need to resolve differences before it can become law.

Discussion