Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 3370 Public Summary

119-HR-3370 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 3370 PROTECT Firefighters Act

A bipartisan House bill would require the U.S. Fire Administration to deliver a one-year strategy to upgrade equipment, training, staffing, and interoperability standards for firefighter Rapid Intervention Teams, including those that respond to port facility fires; as of February 12, 2026, it remains in the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee.

Published
12 Feb 2026
Updated
12 Feb 2026
Tags
US Congress · 119th Congress · H.R. 3370
Unvetted
01 · Section

Public Summary: PROTECT Firefighters Act (H.R. 3370)

Headline Summary: A bipartisan bill directing the U.S. Fire Administration to craft a national strategy to upgrade and standardize Rapid Intervention Team (RIT) equipment, training, and staffing—on land and at ports.

What It Does: The bill orders the U.S. Fire Administrator to submit, within one year of enactment, a comprehensive plan to improve how firefighter Rapid Intervention Teams are equipped, trained, and staffed. It emphasizes consistent standards and interoperability across departments, with special attention to teams that may respond to maritime and port facility fires (including on foreign-flagged ships). The plan must identify current practices, barriers to access (like funding or logistics), and recommend steps Congress could take. It also requires a review of five years of firefighter line‑of‑duty death investigations to identify equipment, training, or staffing gaps and provide targeted fixes.

Strategy due after enactment
1year
Required follow-up briefing
18months after enactment
NIOSH fatality report review window
5years (preceding enactment)

Who’s For It:

  • Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D‑PA) — designated on February 11, 2026, to be considered the first sponsor for adding cosponsors and reprintings.
  • Original sponsors/cosponsors: Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D‑NJ) and Rep. Don Bacon (R‑NE).
  • Supporters generally argue it will modernize rescue readiness, improve cross‑department coordination, and address gaps seen in firefighter line‑of‑duty incidents, including at ports.

Who’s Against It:

  • No formal opposition is noted in the provided record. Potential concerns that could be raised include:
  • Costs or unfunded‑mandate worries for smaller or volunteer departments.
  • Skepticism about a federal role in setting or aligning local fire service standards ("one‑size‑fits‑all" risks).
  • Maritime and port operators’ caution about interoperability expectations that could require new training or specialized gear.

What’s Next: The bill was introduced and referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on May 13, 2025. On February 11, 2026, the House agreed by unanimous consent to consider Rep. Houlahan as the first sponsor for purposes of adding cosponsors and reprintings. As of February 12, 2026, it remains at the committee stage; the next steps would typically be hearings and/or a markup before any full House vote, followed by Senate consideration if it passes the House.

Tone: Neutral, factual, and easy to read.

Discussion