Analyses / Procedural Viability Check / 119 · HR 398 Procedural Viability Check

119-HR-398 DC Insider Procedural Viability Check

119 · HR 398 Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025

bolt Energy
Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025This bill expands the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to give the Department of the Interior the authority to collect certain fees from applicants for,...
Procedural read

Small, technical DOI fee authority with clear House momentum (reported Mar 5, 2026) and friendly committee venues. Passage likely only as part of a broader geothermal/permitting package; stand‑alone path in the Senate would require 60 votes under GOP control. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…

3/5
Composite viability score
60votes
Senate threshold
Published
22 May 2026
Updated
22 May 2026
Tags
energy · public lands · procedural-viability
Unvetted
01 · Section

Score and snapshot

Procedural posture and control landscape as of May 22, 2026: Reported by House Natural Resources on Mar 5, 2026; awaiting floor action. Republicans control both chambers (House majority; Senate led by Majority Leader John Thune); Senate ENR is chaired by Mike Lee. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…

Composite viability score
3/5
Senate threshold
60votes
  • House status: Reported out of committee on voice UC in a multi‑bill geothermal markup; committee press noted bipartisan bundle. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
  • Agency posture: BLM/DOI supports the bill’s goals and confirms current gaps (no GPD fee or inspections fee authority). [2]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includ…
  • Budget scoring analogue: Prior Congress’s near‑identical bill (H.R. 7422, 118th) drew a CBO estimate of negligible net effect (fees = offsetting receipts spent soon after). [3]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recov…
  • Senate environment: GOP‑run ENR (Chair Lee) has been active on geothermal policy, and there’s bipartisan Senate interest on adjacent geothermal streamlining (e.g., STEAM Act by Cortez Masto/Murkowski). [4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resourc…
  • Calendar math: Election‑year floor time compresses after July; path improves if folded into a late‑summer/fall package. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
02 · Section

Rubric assessment (0–5 composite)

  1. Chamber of Origin → Medium. House‑originated but already reported; bipartisan geothermal bundle increases floor prospects. Senate companion not evident, so cross‑chamber lift remains. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
  2. Vehicle Type → Medium‑Low. Stand‑alone authorizing text; best odds as a rider in a geothermal/permitting or public‑lands package rather than consuming scarce floor time. Committee packaging is a positive indicator. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
  3. Senate Threshold → Low‑Medium. Needs 60 votes if stand‑alone; policy is modest/technical, but GOP leadership/ENR chair will want buy‑in on “fees.” Packaging with non‑controversial geothermal items is the viable route. [7]Senate.gov — U.S. Senate: Majority and Minority Leaders page (119th Congress le…
  4. Committee Path → High in House; Unclear in Senate. House NR is aligned and productive here. Senate ENR has geothermal activity but chair prerogatives and branding (AOC‑sponsored House bill) argue for repackaging under a Senate GOP name. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
  5. Must‑Pass Potential → Medium. Credible hitchhiker to a late‑season lands/energy or permitting bundle; weak fit for NDAA/CR on germaneness. The March 5 markup framed a package, which could be a cross‑chamber vehicle. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
  6. Budget Scorekeeping → High. Prior CBO read on the 118th‑Congress version: negligible net effect (offsetting receipts; small report cost). That eases PAYGO/deficit optics. [3]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recov…
  7. Calendar Math → Medium‑Low. With election‑year recesses/district work periods, window narrows after July; odds improve if House passes it with other geothermal bills and ENR moves a counterpart package before the pre‑election slowdown. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
03 · Section

Strategic outlook and plays

  • Brand the text in the Senate under a GOP ENR principal (e.g., chair or a pro‑geothermal Republican) and fold it into a broader geothermal/permitting package; avoid a stand‑alone cloture ask.
  • Sequence: move House bundle under suspension or a structured rule; send to Senate as part of a cross‑committee geothermal package ENR can bless quickly.
  • Leverage DOI support and prior CBO scoring to neutralize “fee” optics; emphasize parity with oil/gas APD cost recovery and faster BLM turnaround. [2]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includ…
  • Target vehicle windows: late July pre‑recess or September omnibus/lands package; outside those windows, the clock beats you. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
Sources cited
  1. [1] Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March 5, 2026 (House Natural Resources markup results) U.S. Government Publishing Office
  2. [2] DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includes H.R. 398) before HNR EMR — Dec. 16, 2025 U.S. Department of the Interior
  3. [3] H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Authority Act of 2024 Congress.gov
  4. [4] U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Chair’s news (Mike Lee as chair) U.S. Senate ENR Committee
  5. [5] House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — updated Mar 26, 2026 House Majority Leader
  6. [6] House Natural Resources Committee press release: Committee Advances Legislation to Unleash Geothermal, Save Our Sequoias (Mar 5, 2026) House Committee on Natural Resources
  7. [7] U.S. Senate: Majority and Minority Leaders page (119th Congress leadership) Senate.gov

Discussion