119-HR-398 DC Insider Procedural Viability Check
119 · HR 398 Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025
Small, technical DOI fee authority with clear House momentum (reported Mar 5, 2026) and friendly committee venues. Passage likely only as part of a broader geothermal/permitting package; stand‑alone path in the Senate would require 60 votes under GOP control. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
Score and snapshot
Procedural posture and control landscape as of May 22, 2026: Reported by House Natural Resources on Mar 5, 2026; awaiting floor action. Republicans control both chambers (House majority; Senate led by Majority Leader John Thune); Senate ENR is chaired by Mike Lee. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
- House status: Reported out of committee on voice UC in a multi‑bill geothermal markup; committee press noted bipartisan bundle. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
- Agency posture: BLM/DOI supports the bill’s goals and confirms current gaps (no GPD fee or inspections fee authority). [2]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includ…
- Budget scoring analogue: Prior Congress’s near‑identical bill (H.R. 7422, 118th) drew a CBO estimate of negligible net effect (fees = offsetting receipts spent soon after). [3]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recov…
- Senate environment: GOP‑run ENR (Chair Lee) has been active on geothermal policy, and there’s bipartisan Senate interest on adjacent geothermal streamlining (e.g., STEAM Act by Cortez Masto/Murkowski). [4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resourc…
- Calendar math: Election‑year floor time compresses after July; path improves if folded into a late‑summer/fall package. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
Rubric assessment (0–5 composite)
- Chamber of Origin → Medium. House‑originated but already reported; bipartisan geothermal bundle increases floor prospects. Senate companion not evident, so cross‑chamber lift remains. [1]U.S. Government Publishing Office — Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March…
- Vehicle Type → Medium‑Low. Stand‑alone authorizing text; best odds as a rider in a geothermal/permitting or public‑lands package rather than consuming scarce floor time. Committee packaging is a positive indicator. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
- Senate Threshold → Low‑Medium. Needs 60 votes if stand‑alone; policy is modest/technical, but GOP leadership/ENR chair will want buy‑in on “fees.” Packaging with non‑controversial geothermal items is the viable route. [7]Senate.gov — U.S. Senate: Majority and Minority Leaders page (119th Congress le…
- Committee Path → High in House; Unclear in Senate. House NR is aligned and productive here. Senate ENR has geothermal activity but chair prerogatives and branding (AOC‑sponsored House bill) argue for repackaging under a Senate GOP name. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
- Must‑Pass Potential → Medium. Credible hitchhiker to a late‑season lands/energy or permitting bundle; weak fit for NDAA/CR on germaneness. The March 5 markup framed a package, which could be a cross‑chamber vehicle. [6]House Committee on Natural Resources — House Natural Resources Committee press…
- Budget Scorekeeping → High. Prior CBO read on the 118th‑Congress version: negligible net effect (offsetting receipts; small report cost). That eases PAYGO/deficit optics. [3]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recov…
- Calendar Math → Medium‑Low. With election‑year recesses/district work periods, window narrows after July; odds improve if House passes it with other geothermal bills and ENR moves a counterpart package before the pre‑election slowdown. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
Strategic outlook and plays
- Brand the text in the Senate under a GOP ENR principal (e.g., chair or a pro‑geothermal Republican) and fold it into a broader geothermal/permitting package; avoid a stand‑alone cloture ask.
- Sequence: move House bundle under suspension or a structured rule; send to Senate as part of a cross‑committee geothermal package ENR can bless quickly.
- Leverage DOI support and prior CBO scoring to neutralize “fee” optics; emphasize parity with oil/gas APD cost recovery and faster BLM turnaround. [2]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includ…
- Target vehicle windows: late July pre‑recess or September omnibus/lands package; outside those windows, the clock beats you. [5]House Majority Leader — House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — upd…
- [1] Congressional Record — Daily Digest, March 5, 2026 (House Natural Resources markup results) U.S. Government Publishing Office
- [2] DOI/BLM testimony on geothermal bills (includes H.R. 398) before HNR EMR — Dec. 16, 2025 U.S. Department of the Interior
- [3] H. Rept. 118-670 (includes CBO estimate) — Geothermal Cost‑Recovery Authority Act of 2024 Congress.gov
- [4] U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Chair’s news (Mike Lee as chair) U.S. Senate ENR Committee
- [5] House 2026 Legislative Calendar (Majority Leader) — updated Mar 26, 2026 House Majority Leader
- [6] House Natural Resources Committee press release: Committee Advances Legislation to Unleash Geothermal, Save Our Sequoias (Mar 5, 2026) House Committee on Natural Resources
- [7] U.S. Senate: Majority and Minority Leaders page (119th Congress leadership) Senate.gov
Discussion