119-S-2369 Investigative Journalist Impact Analysis
119 · S 2369 Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act
At‑a‑glance metrics
Key measurable elements of S.2369’s scope and site context.
Summary
What the bill does: Directs Interior to remove the brass plaque, the inscribed tablet projection, and the “Newlands” name carved into coping stones at the Chevy Chase Circle memorial fountain; removed items must be offered to Newlands’s descendants for 60 days, then retained by NPS (Rock Creek Park museum collection) if unclaimed. [1]Congress.gov — Text of S.2369 (119th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act
Process to date: S.2369 (sponsored by Sen. Van Hollen) was introduced July 22, 2025 and referred to Senate Energy & Natural Resources; on December 9, 2025, the National Parks Subcommittee held a hearing covering S.2369 among other bills. [2]Congress.gov — S.2369 overview page (status, sponsor, committees)[3]Congress.gov — Congress.gov daily schedule (Dec. 9, 2025) showing National Park…
Site context: The fountain (authorized by Congress in 1932, dedicated 1938) is operated by NPS as part of Rock Creek Park; NPS acknowledges controversy around Newlands’s record. The fountain underwent significant rehabilitation in 2022–2023, including work on coping stones—the same features targeted by the bill. [6]National Park Service — NPS: Senator Newlands Memorial (Chevy Chase Circle)[7]National Park Service — NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 re…
Economic Effects
Direct fiscal effects are limited; secondary effects are chiefly procedural and reputational.
- Direct federal costs: No CBO estimate is posted as of December 11, 2025. Given scope (plaque/stone work, surface treatment, relettering concealment, transport, curation), costs are expected to be modest relative to typical monument removals; NPS would absorb planning/contracting/Section 106 expenses. [2]Congress.gov — S.2369 overview page (status, sponsor, committees)
- Cost variance context: Past removals show wide spreads driven by security, litigation, and logistics—not just labor. New Orleans reported roughly $2.1M to remove four large Confederate monuments amid security risks; Baltimore reported spending under $20,000 for overnight removals. S.2369 is far smaller in scale (inscriptions/plaque only). [8]Washington Post — WaPo: In Baltimore, mayor cites New Orleans’ $2.1M statue‑rem…[9]Washington Post — WaPo: One year after, Baltimore says it spent < $20k to remov…
- Collections and storage: If descendants do not claim the items, NPS must accession them into Rock Creek Park’s museum collection (typically housed at NCR’s Museum Resource Center), which entails cataloging, storage, and stewardship duties under NPS Museum Handbook—ongoing but minor per‑object costs. [1]Congress.gov — Text of S.2369 (119th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act[10]National Park Service — Rock Creek Park: Curatorial guidelines and accessioning…[11]National Park Service — NPS Museum Handbook, Part II: Museum Records (accession…
- Operations and visitation: Fountain operations are unaffected (the feature is already functioning post‑rehab). The action does not alter access, hours, or the water system; impacts on local business activity or tourism are likely negligible. [7]National Park Service — NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 re…
Social Effects
Impacts concentrate in community memory, interpretation, and trust in public stewardship.
- Community salience: NPS’s own site notes Newlands advocated restricting immigration and Black voting rights, and acknowledges the controversy around commemorating him; federal removal authority is required because Congress authorized the memorial. [6]National Park Service — NPS: Senator Newlands Memorial (Chevy Chase Circle)
- Documented local demand for change: DC’s Advisory Neighborhood Commission and regional officials have pressed for removing Newlands’s name since 2020–2022; lawmakers reintroduced parallel House/Senate bills across multiple Congresses, indicating persistent constituency interest. [12]Washington Post — WaPo: D.C.’s Chevy Chase neighborhood votes to rename Newland…[13]Congress.gov — H.R. 1256 (117th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act[14]Congress.gov — H.R. 1021 (118th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act[15]Congress.gov — S.417 (118th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act
- Contextual history: Reporting and scholarship describe Chevy Chase’s historic use of exclusionary development practices and covenants, framing the memorial dispute within a broader reckoning over land‑use segregation. The bill’s effect is symbolic but responsive to well‑documented local history. [16]Washington Post — WaPo: The racist history of Chevy Chase, long home to Washing…[17]D.C. Policy Center — D.C. Policy Center: The rise and demise of racially restri…
Environmental Effects
Physical work is limited; the principal environmental dimension is compliance with historic‑property law.
- Scope of work: Removing a plaque and limited inscriptions entails routine stone/metal conservation and handling. No change to hydrology, vegetation, or site footprint is anticipated; temporary noise/dust controls apply during work. (No specific source needed.)
- Historic‑property compliance: Because the fountain is listed in the National Register, NPS must complete NHPA Section 106 review to consider effects on character‑defining features and resolve any adverse effects (e.g., documentation/mitigation). [4]National Park Service — NPS: Section 106 Compliance Program (overview and requi…[18]National Park Service — NPS: HABS/HAER/HALS documentation and Section 106 mitig…
- Operational status: NPS indicates the fountain is on and fully rehabilitated, suggesting environmental baselines (water/lighting) remain unchanged by inscription removal. [7]National Park Service — NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 re…
Temporal Analysis
Distinguishing near‑term implementation from longer‑term stewardship and interpretive effects.
- Immediate (0–6 months post‑enactment): NPS compliance (Section 106), contractor scoping, safe removal/concealment, offer to descendants (60‑day clock). [1]Congress.gov — Text of S.2369 (119th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act[4]National Park Service — NPS: Section 106 Compliance Program (overview and requi…
- Medium term (6–24 months): Accession and curation if unclaimed; potential installation of neutral or contextual signage/exhibits per NPS interpretive planning, if pursued. [11]National Park Service — NPS Museum Handbook, Part II: Museum Records (accession…
- Long term (2+ years): Continued operation/maintenance of the fountain; records and removed items conserved in NPS collections, available for research and interpretation. [19]Web search · turn 5 #1
Unintended Consequences
Risks and second‑order effects to monitor.
- Precedent cascade: Congressional action to alter commemorative elements on a congressionally authorized memorial sets a procedural model other communities could cite for similar changes, increasing workload for NPS and committees. (Inference based on repeated reintroductions and hearings.) [2]Congress.gov — S.2369 overview page (status, sponsor, committees)[3]Congress.gov — Congress.gov daily schedule (Dec. 9, 2025) showing National Park…
- Security/logistics risk: Even small‑scope heritage actions can incur disproportionate costs if controversy triggers protests or threats—seen in unrelated large‑statue removals. While S.2369 is narrow, contingency planning is prudent. [8]Washington Post — WaPo: In Baltimore, mayor cites New Orleans’ $2.1M statue‑rem…
Assessment
Overall stance (analytical, not advocacy): Neutral. Direct economic and environmental effects are minimal; primary impacts are symbolic and administrative (Section 106, museum stewardship). The bill aligns federal assets with locally documented concerns without altering park operations. Residual risks are procedural (historic‑integrity mitigation, potential cost overruns if controversy escalates). [7]National Park Service — NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 re…[6]National Park Service — NPS: Senator Newlands Memorial (Chevy Chase Circle)
Sourcing (primary references)
Key materials used for this assessment.
- Bill text and status: Congress.gov entries for S.2369 and related House mirror (H.R. 4608). [1]Congress.gov — Text of S.2369 (119th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act[2]Congress.gov — S.2369 overview page (status, sponsor, committees)[21]Congress.gov — Text of H.R. 4608 (119th): House companion text
- Hearing inclusion (Dec 9, 2025): Congress.gov daily committee schedule listing S.2369 on the National Parks Subcommittee docket. [3]Congress.gov — Congress.gov daily schedule (Dec. 9, 2025) showing National Park…
- Site facts and controversy: NPS pages on the Senator Newlands Memorial and Rock Creek Park fountains (rehab, coping stones, operations). [6]National Park Service — NPS: Senator Newlands Memorial (Chevy Chase Circle)[7]National Park Service — NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 re…
- Historic‑property compliance: NPS Section 106 guidance and statutory citation (54 U.S.C. §306108). [4]National Park Service — NPS: Section 106 Compliance Program (overview and requi…[22]LII (Cornell Law School) — 54 U.S.C. §306108 (Section 106) – Effect of undertak…
- Local process/history context: Washington Post reporting on the 2020–2022 efforts and rationale for congressional action. [12]Washington Post — WaPo: D.C.’s Chevy Chase neighborhood votes to rename Newland…[23]Washington Post — WaPo: Md. Sens. Van Hollen, Cardin introduce bill to remove F…
- Cost variance examples for monument removals (context, not direct analog): Washington Post reporting on New Orleans and Baltimore cases. [8]Washington Post — WaPo: In Baltimore, mayor cites New Orleans’ $2.1M statue‑rem…[9]Washington Post — WaPo: One year after, Baltimore says it spent < $20k to remov…
- NPS collections stewardship (accessioning/cost duties): NPS Museum Handbook and Rock Creek Park curatorial guidelines. [11]National Park Service — NPS Museum Handbook, Part II: Museum Records (accession…[10]National Park Service — Rock Creek Park: Curatorial guidelines and accessioning…
- [1] Text of S.2369 (119th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act Congress.gov
- [2] S.2369 overview page (status, sponsor, committees) Congress.gov
- [3] Congress.gov daily schedule (Dec. 9, 2025) showing National Parks Subcommittee hearing including S.2369 Congress.gov
- [4] NPS: Section 106 Compliance Program (overview and requirements) National Park Service
- [5] Francis Griffith Newlands Memorial Fountain (NRHP listing info) Wikipedia
- [6] NPS: Senator Newlands Memorial (Chevy Chase Circle) National Park Service
- [7] NPS: Fountains in Rock Creek Park (status, 2022–2023 rehab of Chevy Chase Circle fountain) National Park Service
- [8] WaPo: In Baltimore, mayor cites New Orleans’ $2.1M statue‑removal costs Washington Post
- [9] WaPo: One year after, Baltimore says it spent < $20k to remove Confederate monuments Washington Post
- [10] Rock Creek Park: Curatorial guidelines and accessioning practices (NCR Museum Resource Center) National Park Service
- [11] NPS Museum Handbook, Part II: Museum Records (accessioning, cataloging) National Park Service
- [12] WaPo: D.C.’s Chevy Chase neighborhood votes to rename Newlands fountain; NPS says Congress must act Washington Post
- [13] H.R. 1256 (117th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act Congress.gov
- [14] H.R. 1021 (118th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act Congress.gov
- [15] S.417 (118th): Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act Congress.gov
- [16] WaPo: The racist history of Chevy Chase, long home to Washington’s power players Washington Post
- [17] D.C. Policy Center: The rise and demise of racially restrictive covenants (with Chevy Chase references) D.C. Policy Center
- [18] NPS: HABS/HAER/HALS documentation and Section 106 mitigation National Park Service
- [19] Web search · turn 5 #1
- [20] Web search · turn 8 #3
- [21] Text of H.R. 4608 (119th): House companion text Congress.gov
- [22] 54 U.S.C. §306108 (Section 106) – Effect of undertaking on historic property LII (Cornell Law School)
- [23] WaPo: Md. Sens. Van Hollen, Cardin introduce bill to remove Francis G. Newlands memorial Washington Post
Discussion