Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HRES 1099 Public Summary

119-HRES-1099 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HRES 1099 Reaffirming Iran remains the largest state sponsor of terrorism.

language International Affairs
This resolution states that the House of Representatives declares it is the policy of the United States that Iran continues to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism.

A nonbinding House resolution stating that Iran remains the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism; it cites past attacks and support for proxy groups and seeks to put the House on record. As of March 5, 2026, it was debated under suspension and a vote was postponed.

Published
05 Mar 2026
Updated
05 Mar 2026
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

The House resolution puts the chamber on record that Iran is the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism and affirms that as U.S. policy.

02 · Section

What It Does

This is a simple House resolution (not a law) declaring it is U.S. policy that Iran remains the largest state sponsor of terrorism. It cites Iranian support for groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, references U.S. troop deaths attributed to Iran-backed militias, the January 2024 Tower 22 attack that killed three U.S. service members, Iran’s nuclear activities, and U.N. actions in 2025. It does not create new sanctions, authorize force, or change existing statutes.

03 · Section

Key Numbers Cited in the Resolution

U.S. servicemembers killed in Iraq by Iran‑backed militias (2003–2011), per Pentagon figures cited
603
U.S. servicemembers killed in the Jan. 2024 Tower 22 attack, cited in the text
3
U.N. Security Council resolutions “reimposed” in Sept. 2025, as referenced
6
04 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Sponsors: Reps. Brian Mast (R‑FL), Erin Houchin (R‑IN), and Darrell Issa (R‑CA).
  • Members who argue Iran’s support for proxy groups threatens U.S. troops, allies, and shipping, and that Congress should speak with one voice on that risk.
  • Backers who see value in reaffirming pressure on Tehran and underscoring congressional attention to Iran’s nuclear and regional activities.
05 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition is listed in the provided text. Critics of similar resolutions often warn that sweeping labels can reduce diplomatic flexibility or be read as a precursor to broader sanctions or military steps.
  • Members prioritizing diplomacy may argue the measure is symbolic, adds no new tools, and could complicate negotiations over hostages, de‑escalation in the region, or nuclear monitoring.
06 · Section

What’s Next

Status as of March 5, 2026: The resolution was considered under suspension of the rules with 40 minutes of debate; a vote was ordered but further proceedings were postponed. It is also noted as referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Under suspension, adoption requires a two‑thirds vote of Members present; because it is a simple House resolution, it does not proceed to the Senate or the President.

Discussion