119-S-1498 Journalist Public Summary
A bipartisan Senate bill would bar Members of Congress—and, under the latest version, the President and Vice President—from buying or selling most individual stocks and similar assets, require divestment on set timelines, and add new fines and transparency rules; it was reported out of committee and placed on the Senate calendar on December 10, 2025. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical…
Public Summary — Document 119-S-1498 (S. 1498, “HONEST Act”)
Headline Summary: S. 1498 would ban stock and other covered-asset trading by Members of Congress, and—per the committee’s substitute—also the President and Vice President, require divestment, and impose meaningful penalties for violations. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…[1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical…
What It Does: The bill prohibits covered officials and their spouses/dependent children from purchasing covered investments (like individual stocks, commodities, futures, certain derivatives, and digital assets), with limited exceptions for diversified mutual funds/ETFs, Treasuries, some retirement plans, and narrowly defined cases (e.g., small businesses vetted by ethics officials). It sets deadlines to stop buying immediately and, after a short phase‑in, to sell; requires divestment of assets held—including those in qualified blind trusts, which would be wound down; adds public reporting (including API‑ready, accessible databases); and creates a standard $500 fine for failing to file required STOCK Act transaction reports, alongside civil penalties for noncompliance with the divestment rules. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…[3]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text (Reported to Senate and Intr…
- Key numbers at a glance:
- • Ban on purchases starts on enactment; sales generally barred 90 days after enactment (with divestment windows spelled out). [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • Coverage includes the President and Vice President, not just Members of Congress. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • “Covered investments” include securities, commodities, futures, derivatives/synthetics, and digital assets; diversified mutual funds/ETFs and Treasuries are allowed. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • Blind trusts holding covered investments must sell those assets and then be dissolved on a timetable. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • Civil penalty for not divesting: the greater of the official’s monthly pay or 10% of the non‑divested asset’s value, repeatable every 30 days until fixed. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • STOCK Act add‑on: a $500 fine per missed transaction report starting March 31, 2027. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • Disclosure upgrades: searchable, downloadable reports with API access and accessibility standards. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- Who’s For It:
- • Sponsor: Sen. Josh Hawley (R‑MO). Cosponsors on introduction included Sens. Bernie Moreno (R‑OH), Jon Ossoff (D‑GA), Gary Peters (D‑MI), and Jeff Merkley (D‑OR)—a bipartisan lineup. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS),…
- • Supporters’ rationale: banning trading and requiring divestment is framed as a way to reduce conflicts of interest and rebuild public trust in Congress. [4]Office of Sen. Josh Hawley — Press release: Hawley reintroduces PELOSI Act to b…
- Who’s Against It:
- • Some lawmakers argue existing insider‑trading and disclosure rules already address the problem and say a broad ban is unnecessary. [5]Wall Street Journal — Bipartisan proposal would ban stock trading by lawmakers
- • Others warn that forced divestment could discourage qualified people from serving or unfairly affect spouses’ professional finances, and note Senate skepticism about moving such a bill. [6]Associated Press — Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trad…
What’s Next: On December 10, 2025, the bill was reported out of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar (Calendar No. 294). That means the next step would be possible Senate floor debate and votes; if it passes the Senate, the House would need to act before any version could reach the President. As of today, it has not become law. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.1498 — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical…
- [1] S.1498 — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions (HONEST) Act | Overview and Status Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
- [2] S.1498 — Text as Reported to Senate (RS), including HONEST Act substitute (PDF) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
- [3] S.1498 — Text (Reported to Senate and Introduced versions) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
- [4] Press release: Hawley reintroduces PELOSI Act to ban Congress from trading stocks Office of Sen. Josh Hawley
- [5] Bipartisan proposal would ban stock trading by lawmakers Wall Street Journal
- [6] Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trading stock Associated Press
Discussion