Analyses / Impact Analysis / 119 · HR 1665 Impact Analysis

119-HR-1665 Data-Driven Journalist Impact Analysis

119 · HR 1665 DIGITAL Applications Act

science Science, Technology, Communications
Deploying Infrastructure with Greater Internet Transactions And Legacy Applications Act or the DIGITAL Applications ActThis bill requires the Department of the Interior and the Forest Service to each...
Bottom-line assessment
Overall stance: Neutral to slightly favorable. The bill is targeted and, if resourced, should improve administrative performance (data quality, tracking, timeliness) for communications use authorizations without weakening environmental standards. The scale of real‑world benefits depends on execution quality (IT delivery, staffing) and will be most visible where federal lands are a binding siting constraint (Western states, some tribal areas). [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…[4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…
Federal land share of U.S. acreage
28%
BLM-managed public land
244million acres
USFS National Forest System land
193million acres
Statutory decision deadline on duly filed federal communications-use applications
270days
Published
21 Nov 2025
Updated
21 Nov 2025
Tags
impact-analysis · telecom-infrastructure · federal-lands
Unvetted
01 · Section

Summary

What the bill does: H.R. 1665 (DIGITAL Applications Act) directs the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to each create an online portal to accept, process, and dispose of SF‑299 applications for communications use authorizations, with NTIA linking to those portals. It does not change underlying environmental or land‑use standards. [1]Congress.gov — Text - H.R.1665 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): DIGITAL Applicatio…[2]Congress.gov — All Information (Except Text) for H.R.1665 – Congress.gov

Federal land share of U.S. acreage
28%
BLM-managed public land
244million acres
USFS National Forest System land
193million acres
Statutory decision deadline on duly filed federal communications-use applications
270days
GAO finding: BLM apps lacking reliable timing data (FY2018–2022)
42%

Why it matters: Federal lands (about 28% of U.S. acreage; BLM ≈244M acres; USFS ≈193M acres) are disproportionately located in the West, where many rural/tribal communities depend on towers and backhaul sited on public lands. Faster, more transparent processing can reduce delay variance against the 270‑day statutory clock and make deployment timelines more predictable. [4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…[5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…

Bottom line: If portals (a) improve data completeness and status alerts that GAO says are missing, and (b) are resourced and secured adequately, near‑term administrative gains could translate into modest acceleration of broadband and public‑safety coverage in federal‑land geographies. Environmental guardrails (NEPA/NHPA) persist; collision risks from any incremental towers are real but mitigable with established FAA/USFWS practices. [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…[6]U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — Avoidance and Minimization Measures: Communicati…

02 · Section

Economic Effects

Likely channels of impact and who’s affected.

  • Process efficiency and predictability: By digitizing intake, standardizing fields, and enabling status alerts, portals can address GAO’s findings on incomplete timing data and missed 270‑day deadlines—reducing administrative risk premia in project schedules. USFS has already added tracking/alert features; BLM has open corrective actions. [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…
  • Deployment on federal lands: In the West—where federal ownership is high—more predictable processing can ease siting on existing comm sites and corridors, benefiting carriers, WISPs, FirstNet buildouts, and backhaul providers. [4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…
  • Agriculture and rural productivity spillovers: Expanded rural connectivity supports precision agriculture and market access; USDA estimates potential annual benefits from rural broadband/precision ag on the order of $47–$65B (national). Local realization depends on coverage gaps near federal lands. [8]U.S. Department of Agriculture — USDA press release: A Case for Rural Broadband…
  • Federal and agency revenues/costs: Additional authorizations can increment rental receipts (e.g., USFS communications-site fees) while agencies incur up‑front IT build and O&M costs for portals. No CBO score is posted as of Nov 21, 2025. [9]U.S. Forest Service — Communication Uses – Wireless Uses (USFS program and rent…[2]Congress.gov — All Information (Except Text) for H.R.1665 – Congress.gov
  • Implementation feasibility: DOI notes it already allows electronic SF‑299 filing via MLRS but lacks a full processing/approval portal and may be unable to deliver one within a one‑year deadline given resources—implying schedule/cost risk. [7]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI Statement for the Record on H.R. 3299 / H…
  • IT and cybersecurity risk: GAO continues to list improving federal IT acquisition/management and federal cybersecurity as High‑Risk areas; poorly executed portals could face overruns, delays, or security incidents that negate benefits. [10]Web search · turn 8 #1[11]Web search · turn 8 #3
03 · Section

Social Effects

Implications for communities, workers, and public services.

  • Rural and tribal connectivity: NTIA’s latest Internet Use Survey shows progress but persistent adoption gaps for low‑income and some racial/ethnic groups. Faster deployments on/near federal lands can improve service options in affected geographies. [12]NTIA (U.S. Department of Commerce) — New NTIA Data Show 13 Million More Interne…
  • Public safety: FirstNet reports nationwide coverage exceeding 2.9M square miles, with significant increases on tribal lands since 2020; streamlined siting on federal terrain can support infill and backhaul that improve emergency communications. [13]First Responder Network Authority — FirstNet Announces Initial Network Buildout…
  • Telehealth and care access: Counties with greater broadband capacity saw higher Medicare telehealth utilization during COVID‑19; improved last‑mile/last‑tower buildouts can facilitate sustained virtual care access in remote areas. [14]Web search · turn 6 #4
  • Equity and administrative burden: Portals can lower transaction costs for smaller ISPs and community/tribal applicants, but complex federal landscapes still pose barriers; GAO highlights fragmented programs and application challenges for tribes that portals alone won’t solve. [15]Web search · turn 12 #2
04 · Section

Environmental Effects

What changes environmentally, and what does not.

  • NEPA/NHPA unchanged: The bill does not alter substantive environmental review; agencies remain bound by NEPA and related laws for site authorizations on federal lands. [3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…
  • Categorical exclusions (CEs) often apply for additions at designated sites (<20 acres), which can keep review timelines short without waiving protections. [16]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 36 CFR § 220.6 – Categorical exclusions…
  • Wildlife risks from additional towers: USFWS estimates millions of avian deaths annually from tower collisions; switching to flashing obstruction lights and minimizing guy wires can reduce collisions by up to ~70%. Agencies can condition authorizations accordingly. [6]U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — Avoidance and Minimization Measures: Communicati…
  • Systemic emissions: To the extent connectivity enables telework/tele‑services, peer‑reviewed evidence suggests net VMT and CO₂ reductions can occur, though effects vary by region and can be offset by rebound behaviors; impacts attributable to this bill alone will be modest. [17]MIT JTL / Nature Cities — Impacts of remote work on vehicle miles traveled and…
05 · Section

Temporal Analysis

Sequencing of impacts.

  • 0–12 months (implementation): DOI/USFS must procure/configure portals, integrate with case systems (e.g., MLRS/SUDS), harden cybersecurity, and train staff. DOI has already cautioned that a one‑year full processing portal may be infeasible with current resources. Near‑term risk: IT schedule slippage. [7]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI Statement for the Record on H.R. 3299 / H…[10]Web search · turn 8 #1
  • 1–3 years (process gains): If portals add required fields, status alerts, and dashboards, agencies can meet GAO’s recommendations (data completeness; risk‑of‑delay flags) more reliably, reducing variance around the 270‑day decision clock. [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…
  • 3+ years (outcomes): Incremental acceleration of authorizations at existing sites and corridors in federal‑land states, supporting rural broadband and public‑safety coverage. Magnitude is bounded by where federal lands constrain routes—concentrated in the West. [4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…
06 · Section

Unintended Consequences

Risks and secondary effects to watch.

07 · Section

Assessment

Overall stance: Neutral to slightly favorable. The bill is targeted and, if resourced, should improve administrative performance (data quality, tracking, timeliness) for communications use authorizations without weakening environmental standards. The scale of real‑world benefits depends on execution quality (IT delivery, staffing) and will be most visible where federal lands are a binding siting constraint (Western states, some tribal areas). [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…[4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…

08 · Section

Sourcing

Key sources underpinning this analysis.

  1. Bill text and actions: Congress.gov pages for H.R. 1665. [1]Congress.gov — Text - H.R.1665 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): DIGITAL Applicatio…[2]Congress.gov — All Information (Except Text) for H.R.1665 – Congress.gov
  2. Federal shot‑clock and definitions: 47 U.S.C. §1455. [3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…
  3. Federal land ownership context: CRS, Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data. [4]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Ov…
  4. Process performance and recommendations: GAO‑24‑106157 (Broadband permitting on federal lands). [5]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: A…
  5. Current BLM/USFS program and e‑filing posture: BLM IMs and DOI statements; USFS comm‑site program and fees. [18]Bureau of Land Management — BLM IM 2025‑005 – Addition of Regulations Specific…[7]U.S. Department of the Interior — DOI Statement for the Record on H.R. 3299 / H…[9]U.S. Forest Service — Communication Uses – Wireless Uses (USFS program and rent…
  6. Digital divide context: NTIA Internet Use Survey (2023 results). [12]NTIA (U.S. Department of Commerce) — New NTIA Data Show 13 Million More Interne…
  7. Public safety coverage context: FirstNet Authority updates. [13]First Responder Network Authority — FirstNet Announces Initial Network Buildout…
  8. Environmental guardrails and mitigation: NEPA applicability; USFS CEs; USFWS guidance on tower lighting and design. [3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities…[16]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 36 CFR § 220.6 – Categorical exclusions…[6]U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — Avoidance and Minimization Measures: Communicati…
  9. Potential emissions channel via telework: MIT/Nature Cities study. [17]MIT JTL / Nature Cities — Impacts of remote work on vehicle miles traveled and…
Sources cited
  1. [1] Text - H.R.1665 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): DIGITAL Applications Act Congress.gov
  2. [2] All Information (Except Text) for H.R.1665 – Congress.gov Congress.gov
  3. [3] 47 U.S.C. § 1455 – Wireless facilities deployment Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  4. [4] CRS Report R42346 – Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data Congressional Research Service
  5. [5] GAO‑24‑106157 – Broadband Deployment: Agencies Should Take Steps to Better Meet Deadline for Processing Permits U.S. Government Accountability Office
  6. [6] Avoidance and Minimization Measures: Communication Towers U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
  7. [7] DOI Statement for the Record on H.R. 3299 / H.R. 3283 (pending legislation; portal feasibility and MLRS e‑filing) U.S. Department of the Interior
  8. [8] USDA press release: A Case for Rural Broadband (2019) U.S. Department of Agriculture
  9. [9] Communication Uses – Wireless Uses (USFS program and rental fee schedule) U.S. Forest Service
  10. [10] Web search · turn 8 #1
  11. [11] Web search · turn 8 #3
  12. [12] New NTIA Data Show 13 Million More Internet Users in 2023 than 2021 NTIA (U.S. Department of Commerce)
  13. [13] FirstNet Announces Initial Network Buildout Complete and Invests in Network Evolution First Responder Network Authority
  14. [14] Web search · turn 6 #4
  15. [15] Web search · turn 12 #2
  16. [16] 36 CFR § 220.6 – Categorical exclusions (USFS NEPA) Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  17. [17] Impacts of remote work on vehicle miles traveled and transit ridership in the USA (Nature Cities) MIT JTL / Nature Cities
  18. [18] BLM IM 2025‑005 – Addition of Regulations Specific to the Communications Uses Program Bureau of Land Management

Discussion