Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 7304 Public Summary

119-HR-7304 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 7304 OMAR Act

settings Government Operations and Politics
Oversight for Members And Relatives Act or the OMAR Act This bill prohibits the use of campaign funds to compensate the spouse of a candidate or an individual holding federal office. It also requires...

A House bill would ban federal candidates’ campaign committees from paying a candidate’s spouse, require disclosure of any payments to spouses and other close family, and make candidates—not their committees—personally liable for knowing violations. Introduced January 30, 2026, it now sits with the House Committee on House Administration.

Published
31 Jan 2026
Updated
31 Jan 2026
Tags
US Congress · Campaign Finance · Elections
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

A campaign-finance bill to stop federal candidates’ committees from paying a candidate’s spouse, while forcing disclosure of any payments to spouses and close family, with penalties falling on the candidate if they knowingly break the rule.

02 · Section

What It Does

The Oversight for Members And Relatives Act (the “OMAR Act,” H.R. 7304) would bar a candidate’s authorized campaign committee—and any other political committee the candidate or a federal officeholder controls, except party committees—from directly or indirectly paying the candidate’s spouse for services. It also requires those committees to separately report any payments made to the spouse or to immediate family members (such as children, parents, siblings, in‑laws, and grandchildren). If a violation occurs and the candidate knew about it, any civil penalty would be imposed on the candidate personally, and the committee would be prohibited from reimbursing them. The changes would apply to compensation and payments made on or after the date the bill becomes law.

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Sponsors: Rep. Thomas Tiffany (R‑WI) introduced the bill on January 30, 2026, with Rep. Tony Wied (R‑WI) as a co‑sponsor. Their stated aim, reflected in the text, is to prevent perceived self‑dealing and increase transparency around payments to candidates’ families.
  • Likely supporters: Lawmakers and advocates who prioritize stricter anti‑nepotism safeguards in campaign finance, arguing that donor money should not flow to a candidate’s household and that clearer reporting builds public trust.
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition is recorded at introduction, but common critiques of similar proposals include:
  • It could unfairly restrict small or family‑run campaigns where a spouse provides genuine, market‑rate work, effectively forcing campaigns to hire outsiders even when a spouse is most qualified.
  • Existing disclosure rules already allow voters to judge payments; a categorical spouse‑only ban may be overbroad when transparency and market‑rate standards could suffice.
  • Targeting only spouses (while permitting payments to other immediate family with disclosure) may be inconsistent and invite workarounds.
05 · Section

What’s Next

As of January 30, 2026, H.R. 7304 was introduced and referred to the House Committee on House Administration. The committee may hold hearings or a markup before any House floor vote. To become law, it would need to pass the House and Senate and be signed by the President.

Discussion