Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 5787 Public Summary

119-HR-5787 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 5787 BALL Act

settings Government Operations and Politics
White House Building Activities Locked-out in Lapse Act or the BALL ActThis bill prohibits federal funds from being used for construction or renovation in the White House, on White House...

A brief bill to bar federal spending on non‑emergency White House construction or renovations during a government shutdown; it’s currently waiting in a House subcommittee.

Published
02 Dec 2025
Updated
02 Dec 2025
Tags
119th Congress · Public Summary · H.R. 5787
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

Stops taxpayer money from being used for White House construction or renovations during a government shutdown, unless it’s an emergency fix for health or safety.

02 · Section

What It Does

H.R. 5787 (the “BALL Act”) would prohibit federal funds from being used for construction or renovation in the White House, on its grounds, or in any structure on those grounds during a lapse in appropriations—plainly, during a federal government shutdown. The only exception is work that is directly related to health or safety. Day‑to‑day spending and projects when the government is funded are not affected.

03 · Section

Why It Matters

  • Aims to prevent visible, non‑essential upgrades at the White House while other federal services are paused in a shutdown.
  • Could set a clearer standard for what counts as essential work at high‑profile federal sites during funding lapses.
  • Practical budget impact is likely modest, but the symbolic impact and rules clarity during shutdowns could be significant.
04 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Bill sponsors: Rep. Mark Takano (CA) with Reps. Rashida Tlaib, André Carson, Hank Johnson (GA), Angie Craig, Jared Huffman, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and Eleanor Holmes Norton.
  • General rationale (as commonly argued for measures like this): keep government spending focused on essential needs during shutdowns and avoid the optics of non‑essential renovations at the Executive residence when many federal activities are paused.
05 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition is recorded in the legislative actions provided.
  • Potential criticisms: the White House is a secure, continuously occupied workplace and residence, so some may argue needed upgrades shouldn’t be delayed; others might view the bill as largely symbolic or duplicative of existing shutdown protocols.
06 · Section

What’s Next

Status: Introduced October 17, 2025; referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure the same day; and on December 1, 2025, sent to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. Next typical steps would be a subcommittee hearing and markup, a committee vote, and, if approved, consideration by the full House, then the Senate.

Discussion