Analyses / Prediction Analysis / 119 · SCONRES 33 Prediction Analysis

119-SCONRES-33 DC Insider Prediction Analysis

119 · SCONRES 33 A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035.

trending_up Economics and Public Finance
This concurrent resolution establishes the congressional budget for the federal government for FY2026, sets forth budgetary levels for FY2027-FY2035, and provides reconciliation instructions for...
Enactment probability by July 31, 2026
60%
0%25%50%75%100%
Both chambers adopted S.Con.Res. 33 in late April 2026, triggering narrow reconciliation instructions (Judiciary + Homeland Security; up to $140B over FY2026–2035) aimed at ICE/CBP funding. Senate committees have released and advanced a ~$72B package, but Byrd Rule rulings forced removal of a $1B White House ballroom security provision and timing is tight against a June 1 White House target. Baseline: GOP controls both chambers; Senate can pass with a simple majority if Republicans stay unified. Our read: 60% odds the reconciliation bill clears Congress by July 2026 after trimming extraneous items; 30% odds of slippage into summer; 10% odds it stalls over internal GOP splits/Byrd Rule landmines. [1]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026…
Enactment probability by July 31, 2026 60 %
Senate passage by June 7, 2026 55 %
Published
23 May 2026
Updated
23 May 2026
Tags
budget · reconciliation · immigration
Unvetted
01 · Section

Where the proposal stands (as of May 23, 2026)

  • Status: S.Con.Res. 33 was adopted by both chambers — Senate 50–48 on April 23, 2026; House 215–211–1 on April 29, 2026. [1]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026…
  • What it does: It sets FY2026–FY2035 budget levels and triggers reconciliation instructions to the Judiciary and Homeland Security committees in each chamber to produce legislation that may increase the deficit by up to $70B per committee (max $140B per chamber) with a May 15, 2026 submission deadline. [1]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026…
  • Procedural note: A concurrent budget resolution isn’t presented to the President and appropriates no money; it’s an internal bicameral agreement that enables points of order and, if included, reconciliation. [1]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026…
  • Majority control: Republicans control both chambers; in the Senate, Majority Leader John Thune controls the floor. In the House, Speaker Mike Johnson set consideration under a closed rule. [2]U.S. Senate — U.S. Senate – Majority and Minority Leaders (Leadership list)
  • Follow-on vehicle: Senate committees unveiled roughly $72B in reconciliation text focused on ICE/CBP; the Senate Budget Committee advanced key portions on May 20. [3]American Action Forum — American Action Forum – Senate Releases $72 Billion Rec…
  • Constraints emerging: The Senate parliamentarian ruled that a $1B White House ballroom security add-on cannot ride reconciliation; GOP leaders are weighing dropping it. [4]Associated Press — AP – Senate parliamentarian deals blow to $1B White House se…
02 · Section

Passage probability (reconciliation bill enabled by S.Con.Res. 33)

Bottom line: Republicans can pass a compliant immigration-enforcement reconciliation bill with simple majorities if they keep their conference together and accept parliamentarian trims; timing remains the enemy.

Enactment probability by July 31, 2026
60%
Senate passage by June 7, 2026
55%

Rationale: The budget resolution is already adopted; reconciliation bills can pass with a simple majority and limited debate if they comply with Section 313 (Byrd Rule). The Senate Budget Committee advanced the package on May 20, indicating leadership intends to move quickly; however, the parliamentarian has already forced at least one significant deletion, and additional scrub could be required. [1]Congressional Research Service — CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026…

03 · Section

Obstacles

  • Byrd Rule compliance: Non‑budgetary or tangential provisions will be struck or require 60 votes. The $1B White House ballroom item is already out; further trims could spark intra‑GOP disputes. [5]Congressional Research Service — CRS – The Senate’s Byrd Rule: Frequently Asked…
  • Intra‑conference management: Senate Republicans face pressure from different factions; dropping add‑ons helps, but whip fragility remains in a narrow, high‑salience vote. [6]Axios — Axios – Thune eyes marathon sessions to ease MAGA anger over SAVE Act (…
  • Calendar pressure: The White House set a June 1 target; each additional parliamentarian ruling or floor detour compresses time for House action and any ping‑pong. [7]CBS News — CBS News – Senate advances budget resolution to fund ICE/CBP; June 1…
  • House margin risk: The House majority passed the budget resolution by four votes; a few defections (either hard‑liners demanding policy riders or moderates wary of optics) could force changes that complicate Byrd compliance. [8]U.S. House Clerk — House Roll Call 143 (Apr. 29, 2026) – On agreeing to S.Con.R…
  • Scope constraints: The resolution omits tax‑writing committees; fewer trade‑offs mean fewer bargaining chips to solve holdouts. [9]kpmg.com
04 · Section

Short‑term consequences if it advances

  • Operational stability at ICE/CBP: Senate drafts channel about $72B (FY2026 with multi‑year availability) to core enforcement, personnel, detention capacity, and border operations, reducing DHS stop‑start risk. [10]Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget — CRFB – CBO Scores FY2026 Reconcili…
  • Message politics: Republicans get a border‑security win; Democrats highlight process (reconciliation) and program oversight concerns. Expect amendment messaging fights in vote‑a‑rama. [7]CBS News — CBS News – Senate advances budget resolution to fund ICE/CBP; June 1…
  • Appropriations interplay: Stand‑alone ICE/CBP funding via reconciliation eases immediate DHS pressure but leaves other DHS components to regular bills, keeping leverage battles alive. [11]aha.org
05 · Section

Long‑term consequences

  • Precedent: Normalizing reconciliation to backfill discrete agencies (here, ICE/CBP) could widen future majority incentives to bypass 60‑vote coalitions for contentious enforcement funding. [12]Congressional Research Service — CRS – The Budget Reconciliation Process: Timin…
  • Electoral effects 2026: Immigration/border salience is high among GOP voters; broader electorate prioritizes economy/healthcare, but majorities back a strong border presence — suggesting limited downside in GOP states and mixed effects in swing suburbs. [13]Pew Research Center — Pew Research – State of the Union 2026: Where Americans s…
  • Institutional trade‑offs: More parliamentarian policing of policy riders; parties may increasingly design “clean” funding blocks with minimal extraneous language to survive Byrd scrutiny. [5]Congressional Research Service — CRS – The Senate’s Byrd Rule: Frequently Asked…
06 · Section

Forecast

  1. Most likely (60%): Senate strips remaining Byrd‑exposed items, passes ~$70–72B package on a party‑line vote in early June; House accepts with minimal changes to avoid a second Byrd scrub; President signs in June/July. [14]Bloomberg Government — Bloomberg Government – Budget Panel Sends GOP Border Enf…
  2. Slip but still passes (30%): Additional parliamentarian guidance and intra‑GOP haggling push the Senate vote into late June, with House passage in July after limited ping‑pong. [5]Congressional Research Service — CRS – The Senate’s Byrd Rule: Frequently Asked…
  3. Stall (10%): A handful of GOP senators balk after further deletions; bill is pulled or reworked, deferring ICE/CBP funding fights to the regular appropriations track and fall deadlines. [6]Axios — Axios – Thune eyes marathon sessions to ease MAGA anger over SAVE Act (…

Key verifiers to watch: Senate floor timing notice; a revised manager’s package resolving Byrd flags; any House GOP whip guidance signaling acceptance of the Senate bill without immigration policy riders beyond funding; and whether leadership publicly abandons high‑profile add‑ons (e.g., ballroom security). [4]Associated Press — AP – Senate parliamentarian deals blow to $1B White House se…

Sources cited
  1. [1] CRS Report R48917 – S.Con.Res. 33: The FY2026 Budget Resolution (Apr. 30, 2026) Congressional Research Service
  2. [2] U.S. Senate – Majority and Minority Leaders (Leadership list) U.S. Senate
  3. [3] American Action Forum – Senate Releases $72 Billion Reconciliation Package (May 5, 2026) American Action Forum
  4. [4] AP – Senate parliamentarian deals blow to $1B White House security proposal (May 17, 2026) Associated Press
  5. [5] CRS – The Senate’s Byrd Rule: Frequently Asked Questions (R48640) Congressional Research Service
  6. [6] Axios – Thune eyes marathon sessions to ease MAGA anger over SAVE Act (Mar. 11, 2026) Axios
  7. [7] CBS News – Senate advances budget resolution to fund ICE/CBP; June 1 White House target CBS News
  8. [8] House Roll Call 143 (Apr. 29, 2026) – On agreeing to S.Con.Res. 33 U.S. House Clerk
  9. [9] kpmg.com
  10. [10] CRFB – CBO Scores FY2026 Reconciliation at $72 Billion (May 5, 2026) Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
  11. [11] aha.org
  12. [12] CRS – The Budget Reconciliation Process: Timing of Legislative Action (RL30458) Congressional Research Service
  13. [13] Pew Research – State of the Union 2026: Where Americans stand on key issues (Feb. 23, 2026) Pew Research Center
  14. [14] Bloomberg Government – Budget Panel Sends GOP Border Enforcement Bill to Senate Floor (May 20, 2026) Bloomberg Government

Discussion