Analyses / Prediction Analysis / 119 · S 1476 Prediction Analysis

119-S-1476 DC Insider Prediction Analysis

119 · S 1476 M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act

Enactment in 119th Congress (overall)
25%
0%25%50%75%100%
Bottom line: With Republicans controlling both chambers and Sen. Mike Lee chairing ENR, S.1476 faces high gatekeeper friction despite a Dec. 2, 2025 subcommittee hearing and a prior bipartisan committee report in the 118th. Expect no standalone path; limited (≈25%) chance rides on a narrowed inclusion in a late‑2026 lands package that Lee allows to move. Senate’s 60‑vote hurdle and House GOP control are the binding constraints. [1]Senate.gov — U.S. Senate: Party Division[2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)[3]Congress.gov — S.Res.26 (119th): Majority party’s membership on committees[4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — ENR Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mini…[5]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hear…[6]Congress.gov — S.776 (118th): Gila Wild & Scenic — Status/Calendar[7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Invoking Cloture in the Senat…
Enactment in 119th Congress (overall) 25 %
If part of a bipartisan lands package 35 %
Standalone enactment 8 %
Published
03 Dec 2025
Updated
03 Dec 2025
Tags
Whipline · Public Lands · Wild & Scenic Rivers
Unvetted
01 · Section

Passage Probability

My whip: low odds alone; modest if packaged. Current posture: introduced, heard in subcommittee; no markup scheduled. [8]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic R…[5]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hear…

Enactment in 119th Congress (overall)
25%
If part of a bipartisan lands package
35%
Standalone enactment
8%
  • Gatekeepers: ENR is chaired by Sen. Mike Lee; the Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee is chaired by Sen. John Barrasso—both skeptical of new federal land protections. Their control of the agenda is the bill’s chokepoint. [3]Congress.gov — S.Res.26 (119th): Majority party’s membership on committees[4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — ENR Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mini…
  • Senate math: even with GOP control (53–47), the bill still needs 60 votes for cloture—unlikely on a Democratic-sponsored WSR expansion without trade‑offs. [1]Senate.gov — U.S. Senate: Party Division[7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Invoking Cloture in the Senat…
  • Process to date: S.1476 had a Dec. 2, 2025 subcommittee hearing but no committee markup yet. A prior version (S.776, 118th) was reported with bipartisan support, showing concept viability but not floor viability. [5]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hear…[6]Congress.gov — S.776 (118th): Gila Wild & Scenic — Status/Calendar[9]Congress.gov — S. Rept. 118-67: M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic…
  • House posture: Republicans hold a narrow but real majority; Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman sets the House gate. A Democratic NM‑only measure is unlikely to move alone. [2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)[10]House Natural Resources Committee — Chairman Bruce Westerman – House Natural Re…
  • Packaging variable: Lands packages are the historic vehicle, but Lee has blocked or pared them before; he will curate any bundle and can exclude contentious items. [11]Salt Lake Tribune — Sen. Mike Lee sinks a big public lands package (2018)[12]E&E News by POLITICO — Long-sought public lands deal faces a big obstacle: Mike…
02 · Section

Obstacles

  • Committee gatekeepers: ENR Chair Lee and PLFM Subcommittee Chair Barrasso decide whether S.1476 gets a markup or is included in any bundle. [3]Congress.gov — S.Res.26 (119th): Majority party’s membership on committees[4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — ENR Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mini…
  • Filibuster threshold: Even with a GOP majority, a WSR designation needs 60 votes; there’s no reconciliation path for a policy‑only land designation under the Byrd Rule. [7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Invoking Cloture in the Senat…[13]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Points of Order Limiting the…
  • House bottleneck: GOP control and Westerman’s chairmanship mean low appetite for a Blue‑state, Blue‑sponsor WSR unless it’s traded for Republican priorities. [2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)[10]House Natural Resources Committee — Chairman Bruce Westerman – House Natural Re…
  • Local opposition: Heritage Waters Coalition and allied county/soil & water districts oppose; Freeport‑adjacent concerns about water/diversions are salient. Hill offices read that as litigation and implementation risk. [14]Heritage Waters Coalition — Heritage Waters Coalition – Opposition page[15]Silver City Daily Press — Gila Wild & Scenic bill reintroduced in D.C. (local o…
  • Administration headwinds: Trump‑era DOI/BLM posture emphasizes development; BLM leadership picks signal skepticism toward new withdrawals, complicating SAP/technical assistance. [16]AP News — Trump nominates former New Mexico lawmaker to lead BLM
  • Chair’s history: Lee has previously blocked or tried to reshape lands packages; expect him to screen out items without broad GOP cover. [11]Salt Lake Tribune — Sen. Mike Lee sinks a big public lands package (2018)[17]Web search · turn 10 #0
03 · Section

Short-Term Consequences (next 3–9 months)

  • If the bill advances: most likely via a spring 2026 ENR markup as part of a multi‑bill lands package; expect negotiated amendments (segment reductions; stronger water/mining safe‑harbors) before any chairman’s package. [12]E&E News by POLITICO — Long-sought public lands deal faces a big obstacle: Mike…
  • If it stalls: hearing becomes the ceiling; sponsors pivot to building a package ledger and local press (use of prior committee report as precedent for ‘bipartisan’ viability). [5]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hear…[9]Congress.gov — S. Rept. 118-67: M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic…
  • House outlook: without a Senate package, HNR is unlikely to move the Vasquez companion (H.R. 2903). [19]Web search · turn 8 #3
04 · Section

Long-Term Consequences (if enacted)

What the policy would concretely do; and if it fails, what persists.

  • Designation effects: triggers Section 7—no new FERC‑licensed dams or federally assisted water projects that directly and adversely affect designated values; off‑segment projects cannot ‘invade or unreasonably diminish’ values. [20]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Section 7 of the Wild and Sce…
  • Mineral entry: S.1476 withdraws all federal land within covered segment boundaries from new mineral location/leasing (subject to valid existing rights). This goes beyond the default WSRA. [21]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): Bill Text (Introduced)
  • Management: requires a comprehensive river management plan with state, local, and tribal consultation; and allows native fish restoration projects subject to preserving free‑flow/ORVs. [21]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): Bill Text (Introduced)
  • Land transfer: moves ~440 acres from USFS to NPS to adjust Gila Cliff Dwellings NM boundary. [21]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): Bill Text (Introduced)
  • Politics: In New Mexico and the Mountain West, conservation polling is favorable; passage would let sponsors claim durable wins with outdoor‑rec constituencies and veterans/small‑biz surrogates. [22]Colorado College State of the Rockies Project — 2025 Conservation in the West P…
  • If it fails: status quo remains; opposition groups will cite ‘local control’ and water rights; proponents keep courting inclusion in the next Congress’s lands package. [14]Heritage Waters Coalition — Heritage Waters Coalition – Opposition page
05 · Section

Forecast

Procedural feasibility + whip count realities drive the outcome.

  1. Most probable (≈60%): No enactment in the 119th. Bill gets no markup or is omitted from any chairman’s package; 60‑vote Senate bar and House gatekeepers remain binding. [7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Invoking Cloture in the Senat…[2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)
  2. Secondary (≈25%): Narrowed inclusion in a late‑2026 bipartisan lands package (segment trims/explicit carve‑outs) that clears ENR and passes on a negotiated UC agreement or with broad cloture. [12]E&E News by POLITICO — Long-sought public lands deal faces a big obstacle: Mike…
  3. Long‑shot (≈10%): Senate moves a NM‑centric mini‑package; House stalls or demands offsets/trades—dies in conference or the Speaker’s queue. [2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)
  4. Tail risk (≈5%): Full bill enacted largely intact—would require cross‑party logrolls and New Mexico delegation trading for GOP wins elsewhere. Historical precedent (118th committee report) helps but is not dispositive. [9]Congress.gov — S. Rept. 118-67: M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic…
06 · Section

Sourcing (key authorities)

  • Bill status and text: Congress.gov pages for S.1476 and prior S.776 (118th), including committee report. [8]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic R…[6]Congress.gov — S.776 (118th): Gila Wild & Scenic — Status/Calendar[9]Congress.gov — S. Rept. 118-67: M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic…[21]Congress.gov — S.1476 (119th): Bill Text (Introduced)
  • Hearing record: ENR PLFM Subcommittee hearing notice (Dec. 2, 2025). [5]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hear…
  • Chamber control and procedures: Senate/House party breakdowns; cloture threshold; Byrd Rule constraints. [1]Senate.gov — U.S. Senate: Party Division[2]U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery — House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery)[7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Invoking Cloture in the Senat…[13]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — Points of Order Limiting the…
  • Committee leadership: ENR chair/members; PLFM chair; House Natural Resources chair. [3]Congress.gov — S.Res.26 (119th): Majority party’s membership on committees[4]U.S. Senate ENR Committee — ENR Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mini…[10]House Natural Resources Committee — Chairman Bruce Westerman – House Natural Re…
  • Opposition/support context: Heritage Waters Coalition materials; local press on NM opposition/support; Western conservation polling. [14]Heritage Waters Coalition — Heritage Waters Coalition – Opposition page[15]Silver City Daily Press — Gila Wild & Scenic bill reintroduced in D.C. (local o…[23]Silver City Daily Press — Grant County votes to support Wild and Scenic Gila Ri…[22]Colorado College State of the Rockies Project — 2025 Conservation in the West P…
  • Packaging dynamics and chair posture on lands deals: prior blocks/curation reporting. [11]Salt Lake Tribune — Sen. Mike Lee sinks a big public lands package (2018)[12]E&E News by POLITICO — Long-sought public lands deal faces a big obstacle: Mike…
Sources cited
  1. [1] U.S. Senate: Party Division Senate.gov
  2. [2] House Party Breakdown (Radio-TV Gallery) U.S. House Radio-TV Gallery
  3. [3] S.Res.26 (119th): Majority party’s membership on committees Congress.gov
  4. [4] ENR Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining – Roster (119th) U.S. Senate ENR Committee
  5. [5] Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hearing notice (Dec. 2, 2025) U.S. Senate ENR Committee
  6. [6] S.776 (118th): Gila Wild & Scenic — Status/Calendar Congress.gov
  7. [7] Invoking Cloture in the Senate (CRS In Brief) Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov
  8. [8] S.1476 (119th): M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act — Overview Congress.gov
  9. [9] S. Rept. 118-67: M.H. Dutch Salmon Greater Gila Wild and Scenic River Act Congress.gov
  10. [10] Chairman Bruce Westerman – House Natural Resources Committee House Natural Resources Committee
  11. [11] Sen. Mike Lee sinks a big public lands package (2018) Salt Lake Tribune
  12. [12] Long-sought public lands deal faces a big obstacle: Mike Lee E&E News by POLITICO
  13. [13] Points of Order Limiting the Contents of Reconciliation Legislation: In Brief (Byrd Rule) Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov
  14. [14] Heritage Waters Coalition – Opposition page Heritage Waters Coalition
  15. [15] Gila Wild & Scenic bill reintroduced in D.C. (local opposition/support context) Silver City Daily Press
  16. [16] Trump nominates former New Mexico lawmaker to lead BLM AP News
  17. [17] Web search · turn 10 #0
  18. [18] Group pitches deal on Gila Wild and Scenic segments Wild Gila River (advocacy repost of local coverage)
  19. [19] Web search · turn 8 #3
  20. [20] Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov
  21. [21] S.1476 (119th): Bill Text (Introduced) Congress.gov
  22. [22] 2025 Conservation in the West Poll (Colorado College) Colorado College State of the Rockies Project
  23. [23] Grant County votes to support Wild and Scenic Gila River Silver City Daily Press

Discussion