119-HRES-811 Journalist Public Summary
119 · HRES 811 Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2025, to October 31, 2025, as "Bat Week".
H. Res. 811 is a simple House resolution to recognize Oct 24–31, 2025 as “Bat Week,” highlight bats’ benefits (like pest control and pollination), and signal support for conservation and research against white‑nose syndrome; it was introduced Oct 17, 2025 and referred to the House Agriculture Committee.
Headline Summary
A symbolic House resolution to recognize Oct 24–31, 2025 as “Bat Week,” spotlighting bats’ role in agriculture and ecosystems and encouraging conservation and disease‑control efforts.
What It Does
The resolution expresses the House’s support for designating Oct 24–31, 2025 as “Bat Week.” It encourages public events and education, acknowledges bats’ value as pollinators and natural pest control, and states the House’s intent to keep working to conserve bat species and defeat white‑nose syndrome. As a simple House resolution, it does not change law, appropriate money, or require action by agencies.
Who’s For It
- Sponsor: Rep. Becca Balint (D‑VT).
- Likely allies based on the text’s acknowledgments: wildlife and land‑management agencies (e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management), researchers (U.S. Geological Survey), and conservation partners involved in bat monitoring and white‑nose syndrome response.
- Farm and forestry stakeholders who benefit from natural pest control and pollination may be supportive of awareness efforts.
Who’s Against It
- No formal opposition is noted in the text.
- Potential objections some members raise with commemorative resolutions in general: they are symbolic, do not create policy change, and may be seen as lower priority for floor time.
- Skeptics could also argue that conservation priorities or federal research funding should be debated in authorizing/appropriations bills rather than via symbolic measures.
What’s Next
As of October 17, 2025, H. Res. 811 was introduced and referred to the House Committee on Agriculture. If the committee takes it up and reports it, the resolution could be considered on the House floor. As a House‑only measure, it would not go to the Senate or the President.
Discussion