119-SRES-645 Journalist Public Summary
119 · SRES 645 A resolution recognizing 2026 as the "International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists".
A bipartisan Senate simple resolution (S. Res. 645) to recognize 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists, celebrate the economic and ecological value of U.S. rangelands and the people who manage them, and encourage agencies and universities to promote related education, research, and outreach. It is symbolic—no new funding or legal changes—and was referred to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on March 17, 2026.
Headline Summary
The Senate resolution would formally recognize 2026 as the “International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists,” spotlighting the role of ranchers and rangelands in food, wildlife habitat, and rural economies, while urging education and outreach—without creating new laws or funding.
What It Does
- States the Senate’s recognition of 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists. - Affirms the economic, social, and environmental importance of rangelands and the people who manage them (ranchers, pastoralists, farmers, land managers, and partners). - Encourages Federal agencies, universities, and organizations to engage in education, research, and outreach on rangeland management. - Makes no changes to law, regulations, or federal spending; it is a symbolic (nonbinding) statement.
Who’s For It
- Lead sponsor: Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY).
- Bipartisan co-sponsors at introduction included Sens. Ben Luján (D-NM), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Pete Ricketts (R-NE), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Steve Daines (R-MT), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), John Curtis (R-UT), Mike Crapo (R-ID), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV).
- Supporters’ stated reasons (from the resolution’s findings): rangelands underpin food production and rural livelihoods; provide wildlife habitat, water, and carbon storage; and, when well managed, grazing can reduce catastrophic wildfire risk and support biodiversity.
Who’s Against It
- No formal or organized opposition noted at introduction.
- Common critiques you might hear: (1) symbolic resolutions don’t deliver resources or policy change; (2) some environmental advocates debate the net ecological effects of grazing in certain landscapes; (3) skeptics may prefer targeted legislation or funding over statements of support.
What’s Next
As of March 19, 2026, the resolution is in the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. If the committee advances it, the full Senate could adopt it (often by unanimous consent or voice vote). Because it is a Senate simple resolution, it would not go to the House or the President and would not change existing law.
At-a-Glance Bill Facts
- Bill
- S. Res. 645 (119th Congress)
- Introduced
- March 17, 2026
- Sponsor
- Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
- Select Cosponsors (at introduction)
- Sens. Ben Luján, Mike Rounds, Pete Ricketts, Marsha Blackburn, Steve Daines, Jerry Moran, Cindy Hyde-Smith, John Curtis, Mike Crapo, John Hickenlooper, Jacky Rosen, Catherine Cortez Masto
- Committee
- Senate Energy and Natural Resources
- Latest Action
- Referred to committee (March 17, 2026)
Discussion