Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HRES 1096 Public Summary

119-HRES-1096 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HRES 1096 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4213) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

account_balance Congress
This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4213) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other...

A House procedural resolution that sets the terms for debating and voting on the FY2026 Homeland Security funding bill (H.R. 4213)—automatically swapping in a substitute text, waiving most procedural objections, and limiting debate and amendments; as of March 3, 2026, it sits with the Rules Committee and would trigger immediate floor consideration once adopted.

Published
04 Mar 2026
Updated
04 Mar 2026
Tags
U.S. House of Representatives · 119th Congress · Appropriations
Unvetted
01 · Section

Public Summary — 119-HRES-1096 (procedure for the FY2026 DHS funding bill)

Headline Summary: A one-time set of “ground rules” for how the House will consider the 2026 Homeland Security spending bill, designed to speed up a vote and tightly manage floor debate.

What It Does: If the House adopts this resolution, it immediately brings up H.R. 4213 (the DHS appropriations bill) under strict terms. It automatically replaces the bill’s text with a substitute drawn from H.R. 7481, treats the bill as already read, waives most procedural objections (“points of order”), orders a final vote after limited proceedings, allows only one hour of debate split between the parties, and permits just one motion to recommit. It also temporarily sets aside certain standing House rules for this bill and, if H.R. 4213 passes, directs the Clerk to notify the Senate within three calendar days.

Why It Matters: The rule shapes how quickly DHS funding can move and whether rank-and-file members can try to change it on the floor. A tightly structured rule can protect a negotiated package from last‑minute amendments, while critics may see it as curbing open debate. The outcome affects agencies like Border Patrol, FEMA, TSA, and the Coast Guard, and, by extension, border management, disaster response, and transportation security.

Who’s For It:

  • The sponsor, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, and members who want to bring DHS funding to a vote quickly and on predictable terms.
  • Majority leadership (whichever party controls the floor) seeking to protect a negotiated package from unexpected amendments and delays.
  • Members who specifically support swapping in the H.R. 7481 text and want that version to be the base bill.

Who’s Against It:

  • Members who oppose limiting amendments or waiving points of order on principle, arguing the process is too closed.
  • Lawmakers who dislike replacing the bill’s text automatically (“self‑executing” approach) or believe committees and open floor debate should do that work.
  • Those who object to the underlying DHS funding or policy direction (e.g., border security, immigration enforcement, disaster relief levels) and see a restrictive rule as shielding it from changes.

What’s Next: As of March 3, 2026, the resolution is with the House Rules Committee. If the committee reports it and the House adopts it, the chamber would immediately take up H.R. 4213 under these terms; if H.R. 4213 then passes, the Clerk must notify the Senate within three calendar days.

Discussion