Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 8996 Public Summary

119-HR-8996 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 8996 Rental Housing Investment Act

A bipartisan House bill would let developers immediately write off much of the cost of new multi-unit rental housing—up to $150,000 per unit, or $250,000 for qualifying affordable projects—with safeguards that claw back the benefit if properties stop being used as rentals within 10–15 years. It aims to speed construction and expand supply but could reduce federal revenue and may not guarantee lower rents.

Published
02 Jun 2026
Updated
02 Jun 2026
Tags
tax · housing · depreciation
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

Let builders expense most costs of new multi-unit rental housing up front to spur construction, with larger incentives for affordable housing and clawbacks if properties stop being rentals.

02 · Section

What It Does

The Rental Housing Investment Act (H.R. 8996) would create an elective “bonus depreciation” for new long‑term residential rental property (at least two units). In the year a qualifying building is placed in service, owners could deduct an extra amount tied to unit count, capped by the property’s cost (excluding land). Affordable housing projects that meet Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit set‑aside tests receive a higher per‑unit cap and a longer compliance period. If a property stops being used as rental housing within the required period, prior deductions are recaptured (paid back through tax). The provision applies to property placed in service starting 12 months after enactment and treats these buildings as Section 1245 property for recapture.

Per‑unit bonus limit
150000$
Affordable-housing per‑unit limit
250000$
Alternative cap
100%
Minimum property size
2units
Recapture period
10years
Affordable recapture period
15years
Effective after
12months
03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Bipartisan House sponsors: Reps. Linda Sánchez (D‑CA), Claudia Tenney (R‑NY), Jimmy Panetta (D‑CA), and Darin LaHood (R‑IL).
  • Supporters argue faster cost recovery will unlock more apartment construction, especially where financing is tight.
  • Affordable‑housing developers may favor the higher per‑unit cap for projects that meet Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit set‑aside tests.
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition is noted in the provided record at introduction (May 21, 2026).
  • Potential concerns: revenue loss to the federal budget; benefits flowing mainly to investors rather than tenants; uncertain impact on rents without complementary affordability or tenant‑protection measures; and risks of abuse if compliance isn’t closely monitored despite recapture rules.
05 · Section

What’s Next

As of May 21, 2026, the bill was introduced and referred to the House Ways and Means Committee. Next steps typically include committee hearings and markup, potential budget scoring, and—if advanced—a House floor vote before any Senate consideration.

Discussion