Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 5804 Public Summary

119-HR-5804 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 5804 Providing Robust Organics and Diets for Urban Communities Everywhere Act

Reauthorizes USDA’s Office of Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production through 2030 and doubles its annual authorization to $50 million for fiscal years 2025–2030; introduced Oct 21, 2025 and referred to the House Agriculture Committee. Supporters say it boosts community food access and urban farming; skeptics may question federal cost, focus, and program effectiveness.

Published
22 Oct 2025
Updated
22 Oct 2025
Tags
public-summary · US Congress · agriculture
Unvetted
01 · Section

Public Summary — 119-HR-5804 (PRODUCE Act)

Headline Summary: The PRODUCE Act would extend USDA’s Office of Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production through 2030 and authorize $50 million per year to support urban and innovative farming projects.

What It Does: The bill updates existing law to keep the USDA’s urban agriculture office running until 2030 and increases its annual authorization from $25 million to $50 million for fiscal years 2025–2030. In plain terms, it renews and expands federal support for projects like urban farms, community gardens, and other innovative food production efforts in cities.

Authorized funding (annual)
50million USD/year
Authorization window
2025to 2030 (FYs)
Total authorized over the period (if fully funded)
300million USD
Program office
0USDA Office of Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production (reauthorized)
  • Who’s For It: Introduced by Rep. Menendez (NJ) with cosponsors Carter (LA), Norton (DC), Vargas (CA), Carson (IN), and Cohen (TN). Supporters argue the bill would help expand local food options, support community gardens and urban growers, and spur innovation in food production.
  • Additional likely supporters: city governments, community garden networks, food-access advocates, and some environmental and anti-food-waste groups, who see urban agriculture as a way to improve access to fresh produce and build local resilience.
  • Who’s Against It: No formal opposition is listed yet. Potential skeptics could include fiscal conservatives wary of higher federal spending, those who prefer focusing farm funds on rural or traditional agriculture, and analysts who question whether urban agriculture delivers results at scale.

What’s Next: As of October 22, 2025, the bill has been introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Agriculture. The next steps would typically include committee hearings and a markup. If it passes committee, it would go to a full House vote, then the Senate, and finally to the President.

Discussion