Analyses / Procedural Viability Check / 119 · HR 3831 Procedural Viability Check

119-HR-3831 DC Insider Procedural Viability Check

119 · HR 3831 Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025

park Public Lands and Natural Resources
Florida Safe Seas Act of 2025This bill prohibits shark feeding in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) seaward of Florida for any purpose other than to harvest sharks, subject to limited...
Procedural read

Narrow, bipartisan Florida fisheries tweak with House Natural Resources action (hearing in 2025; ordered reported Mar. 5, 2026) but no posted Senate companion; most viable as a suspension or as a low‑controversy rider to a maritime/CJS package. Senate floor is GOP‑run under Thune with Commerce chaired by Cruz; with Florida senators engaged on shark policy, a hotline/UC path is plausible if no industry science fights flare up. Composite: 3/5. [1]U.S. House Committee Repository — Full Committee Markup agenda listing H.R. 383…

3/5
Composite viability
60votes
Senate threshold if stand‑alone
0/1
CBO estimate posted
Published
22 May 2026
Updated
22 May 2026
Tags
procedural-viability · H.R. 3831 · Florida Safe Seas Act
Unvetted
01 · Section

Assessment and score

Bottom line: movable if it rides or runs as a noncontroversial UC/suspension; harder as a stand‑alone with scarce late‑session floor time. Composite viability: 3/5. House committee marked up on Mar. 5, 2026; Congress.gov still shows no CBO estimate posted. [1]U.S. House Committee Repository — Full Committee Markup agenda listing H.R. 383…

Composite viability
3/5
Senate threshold if stand‑alone
60votes
CBO estimate posted
0/1
02 · Section

Rubric walkthrough

  • Chamber of Origin: House bill led by Rep. Daniel Webster with bipartisan Florida co‑sponsors; heard in Subcommittee (Jul. 22, 2025). Strength: regional, bipartisan; Weakness: House‑only to date. [2]Library of Congress — Congress.gov All Info for H.R. 3831 (status, cosponsors,…
  • Vehicle Type: Amends Magnuson‑Stevens; not must‑pass on its own. Best hook is to hitch to a maritime/NOAA or CJS train; precedent exists for maritime titles getting folded into larger vehicles (e.g., Coast Guard Authorization carried in the FY26 NDAA). [3]House T&I Committee — Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 page (noting inclus…
  • Senate Threshold: Non‑budget authorizing bill; needs UC or 60 for cloture if contested. Majority Leader controls the floor and UC framework. [4]U.S. Senate — U.S. Senate: About Parties and Leadership — Majority/Minority Lea…
  • Committee Path: House Natural Resources advanced it (ordered reported Mar. 5, 2026). On the Senate side, Commerce (Chair Cruz) would have jurisdiction; no public Senate companion posted. [1]U.S. House Committee Repository — Full Committee Markup agenda listing H.R. 383…
  • Must‑Pass Potential: Viable as a small rider to a maritime/NOAA/CJS minibus or another end‑of‑year vehicle; as a pure stand‑alone it competes with appropriations and campaign‑season messaging. [3]House T&I Committee — Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 page (noting inclus…
  • Budget Scorekeeping: Prohibitory policy with enforcement under existing MSA authorities; no new program. No CBO estimate posted on Congress.gov as of today. [2]Library of Congress — Congress.gov All Info for H.R. 3831 (status, cosponsors,…
  • Calendar Math: It’s May 22, 2026 in the 2nd session; floor time tight. Realistic windows: suspension week in the House; hotline/UC in the Senate tied to a larger maritime/CJS package. (Analytic assessment.)
03 · Section

Policy context that helps (or hurts)

  • What the bill does: It extends the existing MSA §317 shark‑feeding ban (now limited to Hawaii and certain Pacific areas) to the EEZ off Florida. [5]Cornell LII — 16 U.S.C. §1866 (MSA §317) – Shark feeding (Hawaii/Pacific)
  • Florida backdrop: State rules already prohibit fish/shark feeding for divers in state waters; the bill would mirror that policy in adjacent federal waters—reducing state/federal mismatch but drawing pushback from shark‑tour operators. [6]Cornell LII — Fla. Admin. Code R. 68B‑5.005 – Divers: Fish Feeding Prohibited
  • Senate climate: Republicans hold the chamber (119th); Thune sets the floor; Commerce Chair Cruz is generally open to moving targeted, member‑priority items when they’re non‑controversial; Florida senators are active on shark issues (e.g., SHARKED Act). Net: a hotline is plausible if stakeholders don’t object. [7]U.S. Senate — U.S. Senate: Party Division (119th Congress)
04 · Section

Tactical path to yes

  1. House: Request suspension of the rules with a tight floor script framed as aligning federal law with Florida’s safety regs; lean on bipartisan Florida delegation. If Rules time opens, keep it closed to amendments to avoid scope creep. [2]Library of Congress — Congress.gov All Info for H.R. 3831 (status, cosponsors,…
  2. Senate: Line up a hotline with Florida senators and Commerce staff; be prepared with a UC if no holds materialize. If there’s friction, pivot to a manager’s package on a maritime/CJS vehicle. [4]U.S. Senate — U.S. Senate: About Parties and Leadership — Majority/Minority Lea…
  3. Fallback: If floor gets crowded, aim for inclusion in any late‑year maritime/NOAA or NDAA‑adjacent division where fishery/Coast Guard items are aggregated. [3]House T&I Committee — Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 page (noting inclus…
Sources cited
  1. [1] Full Committee Markup agenda listing H.R. 3831 with Committee Action Report (Mar. 5, 2026) U.S. House Committee Repository
  2. [2] Congress.gov All Info for H.R. 3831 (status, cosponsors, CBO tab) Library of Congress
  3. [3] Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 page (noting inclusion in FY26 NDAA) House T&I Committee
  4. [4] U.S. Senate: About Parties and Leadership — Majority/Minority Leaders (role, UC) U.S. Senate
  5. [5] 16 U.S.C. §1866 (MSA §317) – Shark feeding (Hawaii/Pacific) Cornell LII
  6. [6] Fla. Admin. Code R. 68B‑5.005 – Divers: Fish Feeding Prohibited Cornell LII
  7. [7] U.S. Senate: Party Division (119th Congress) U.S. Senate

Discussion