Analyses / Impact Analysis / 119 · S 2283 Impact Analysis

119-S-2283 Investigative Journalist Impact Analysis

119 · S 2283 A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office".

settings Government Operations and Politics
This bill designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office".
Bottom-line assessment
Overall stance based on evidentiary record.
Typical USPS dedication plaque cost (low)
250USD
Typical USPS dedication plaque cost (high)
500USD
Historic post office namings enacted (93rd–115th Congresses)
794facilities
Published
10 Oct 2025
Updated
10 Oct 2025
Tags
Impact Analysis · U.S. Congress · Postal Facility Naming
Vetted
01 · Section

Summary

S. 2283 designates the USPS facility at 201 W Oklahoma Ave, Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the “Oscar J. Upham Post Office.” On October 9, 2025, the bill text was published in an Engrossed-in-Senate version noting Senate passage; Congress.gov’s general status page may lag in reflecting that action. Net impacts are minimal: a commemorative plaque and ceremony, with no change to postal routing or external signage. [3]Congress.gov (GPO-labeled) — S.2283 Engrossed in Senate text (with "Passed the…[4]Congress.gov — S.2283 All Information page (status tracker)[1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…

Typical USPS dedication plaque cost (low)
250USD
Typical USPS dedication plaque cost (high)
500USD
Historic post office namings enacted (93rd–115th Congresses)
794facilities
02 · Section

Economic Effects

Material fiscal effects are negligible and limited to commemorative implementation by USPS.

  • Direct federal budget impact: CBO has repeatedly found post office naming packages to have no significant effect on spending or revenues; any USPS costs are insignificant and subject to appropriations. [5]Congressional Budget Office — CBO Cost Estimate (Oct. 5, 2022): H.R. 7988, Legi…
  • USPS implementation costs: CRS indicates tangible effects are typically a small lobby plaque (about 11×14 inches), locally purchased at USPS expense—historically about $250–$500—plus minor staff time for a brief dedication event. [2]Congressional Research Service (archival mirror) — CRS Report RS21562 (archived…
  • Operations and market effects: Naming does not alter USPS addressing systems or routing, so there is no effect on mail services, local business logistics, asset values, or employment tied to postal operations. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
03 · Section

Social Effects

Effects are symbolic, localized, and non-coercive.

  • Community recognition: Commemorative legislation is used to express public gratitude and remembrance; local salience may increase civic engagement around a dedication event, but effects are non-quantified and short-lived. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
  • Continuity of wayfinding and identity: Because USPS retains the facility’s geographic designation for operational reasons, residents and businesses see no change to mailing addresses or external building name, limiting confusion risks. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
04 · Section

Environmental Effects

No construction or operational changes are authorized by S. 2283.

  • NEPA posture: Routine administrative actions with no potential for significant environmental impact are categorically excluded under USPS NEPA rules; a dedication plaque and ceremony would typically meet those criteria. [6]Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School) — 39 CFR § 775.6 — Categorical…
  • No new capital works: The bill does not fund or mandate facility modifications affecting energy use, materials, or emissions. (No separate citation required.)
05 · Section

Temporal Analysis

Distinguishing immediate actions from long-run consequences.

  • Short term (enactment to 6 months): Procurement of a commemorative plaque; a dedication event; negligible USPS staff time. [2]Congressional Research Service (archival mirror) — CRS Report RS21562 (archived…
  • Long term (beyond 1 year): Ongoing operations unchanged; plaque remains in lobby; no recurring fiscal or environmental effects anticipated. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
06 · Section

Unintended Consequences

Risks are primarily reputational or procedural rather than economic or environmental.

  • Reputational risk if future information about the honoree emerges; House and Senate screening practices (e.g., cosponsor thresholds, limits on honorees) exist to manage such risks. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
  • Legislative bandwidth: Volume of commemorative bills has been significant historically; chambers maintain procedures to minimize floor and committee time devoted to them. [7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R46644: Commemorat…
  • Records management: Statutory “references” clauses avoid costly updates to maps or documents; USPS does not alter internal addressing nomenclature, limiting downstream confusion. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…
07 · Section

Assessment

Overall stance based on evidentiary record.

Neutral. S. 2283 is an honorific designation with de minimis fiscal exposure, symbolic local benefits, and no measurable environmental or market effects. [5]Congressional Budget Office — CBO Cost Estimate (Oct. 5, 2022): H.R. 7988, Legi…[1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…

08 · Section

Sourcing

Principal references used in this analysis.

  • Bill text and status: Congress.gov, including the Engrossed‑in‑Senate version dated October 9, 2025. [3]Congress.gov (GPO-labeled) — S.2283 Engrossed in Senate text (with "Passed the…[4]Congress.gov — S.2283 All Information page (status tracker)
  • Commemorations practices, operational implications (plaque; no address change): CRS reports. [1]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R43539: Commemorat…[8]Web search · turn 1 #2
  • Plaque specifications and historical cost range: CRS (RS21562). [2]Congressional Research Service (archival mirror) — CRS Report RS21562 (archived…
  • Budgetary effects of postal naming legislation: CBO estimate for a package of USPS naming bills. [5]Congressional Budget Office — CBO Cost Estimate (Oct. 5, 2022): H.R. 7988, Legi…
  • NEPA categorical exclusions applicable to routine administrative actions: USPS NEPA rules. [6]Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School) — 39 CFR § 775.6 — Categorical…
  • Historical context on commemorative workload: CRS trends analysis. [7]Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov — CRS Report R46644: Commemorat…
Sources cited
  1. [1] CRS Report R43539: Commemorations in Congress: Options for Honoring Individuals, Groups, and Events (Updated June 17, 2025) Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov
  2. [2] CRS Report RS21562 (archived): Naming Post Offices Through Legislation — Dedication plaque details and costs Congressional Research Service (archival mirror)
  3. [3] S.2283 Engrossed in Senate text (with "Passed the Senate Oct. 9, 2025") Congress.gov (GPO-labeled)
  4. [4] S.2283 All Information page (status tracker) Congress.gov
  5. [5] CBO Cost Estimate (Oct. 5, 2022): H.R. 7988, Legislation to Name United States Post Offices Congressional Budget Office
  6. [6] 39 CFR § 775.6 — Categorical exclusions (USPS NEPA procedures) Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School)
  7. [7] CRS Report R46644: Commemorative Legislation in Congress: Trends and Observations (Dec. 18, 2020) Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov
  8. [8] Web search · turn 1 #2

Discussion