Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · S 3360 Public Summary

119-S-3360 Journalist Public Summary

119 · S 3360 FREEDOM Act

A bipartisan Senate bill would order the State Department to study practical ways — including new “direct‑to‑cell” satellite links — to help Iranians get online despite government blocks; it cleared the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on January 29, 2026 and now awaits a Senate vote. (congress.gov)

Published
30 Jan 2026
Updated
30 Jan 2026
Tags
Public Bill Summary · US Congress · Iran
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

A short, bipartisan measure that requires the State Department to deliver a plan for expanding internet access in Iran — including testing whether direct‑to‑cell satellite service could work — has advanced out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and is headed to the full Senate. (congress.gov)

02 · Section

What It Does

The bill orders a report, due 120 days after enactment, that updates the U.S. strategy on internet freedom in Iran. It specifically asks for: (1) a feasibility review of direct‑to‑cell wireless/satellite options; (2) analysis of drones, jamming, and countermeasures that could help or hinder service; (3) a survey of Iran’s telecom providers, including who owns or controls them and what that means for censorship; and (4) any other relevant opportunities and risks. The report must be unclassified, with an optional classified annex. (congress.gov)

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Lead sponsors: Sen. Jacky Rosen (D‑NV) and Sen. Dave McCormick (R‑PA) — signaling bipartisan backing. (congress.gov)
  • Senate Foreign Relations Committee advanced the bill on January 29, 2026 (with a managers’ substitute), moving it toward a floor vote. (foreign.senate.gov)
  • Supporters say the study is needed because Iran tightly controls the internet and often disrupts access, so new technical paths to connect ordinary users should be explored. (freedomhouse.org)
  • There’s also a bipartisan House companion (H.R. 6469) with multiple cosponsors, indicating cross‑chamber interest. (congress.gov)
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal, public opposition was evident in official summaries or committee readouts as of January 30, 2026. (foreign.senate.gov)
  • Potential concerns some observers might raise: user safety if Iranian authorities detect connections; the technical and cost feasibility of direct‑to‑cell in a hostile environment; compliance with export controls/sanctions; and whether U.S. involvement in telecom work inside Iran could spark diplomatic blowback.
05 · Section

What’s Next

After clearing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on January 29, 2026, the bill awaits consideration by the full Senate. A similar House bill (H.R. 6469) has been referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee; either chamber could act next. (foreign.senate.gov)

Discussion