Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 5852 Public Summary

119-HR-5852 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 5852 Upper Raritan River Watershed Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025

A bipartisan House bill would have the National Park Service study whether parts of New Jersey’s Upper Raritan River watershed qualify for National Wild and Scenic status; it was introduced on October 28, 2025 and sent to the House Natural Resources Committee, with backing from the sponsors and regional conservation groups. [1]Congress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.5852 — 119th Congress (2025–2026): Upp…[2]Office of Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. — Kean, Watson Coleman Introduce Bipartisan Bill…

Published
30 Oct 2025
Updated
30 Oct 2025
Tags
Public Summary · 119-HR-5852 · Wild & Scenic Rivers
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

Directs the National Park Service to study parts of the Upper Raritan River watershed in New Jersey for possible addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. [1]Congress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.5852 — 119th Congress (2025–2026): Upp…

02 · Section

What It Does

The bill orders a federal feasibility study of the Upper Raritan’s key streams—such as the North Branch, South Branch, and Lamington/Black River—to see if they meet Wild and Scenic criteria. The study would evaluate eligibility (free‑flowing condition and special values) and suitability, and report findings to Congress. If designated later, management would likely follow the “Partnership Wild & Scenic” model, which relies on collaboration with towns and local groups rather than federal land acquisition. [2]Office of Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. — Kean, Watson Coleman Introduce Bipartisan Bill…[3]U.S. National Park Service — Eligible and Suitable — Wild and Scenic Rivers Pro…[4]U.S. National Park Service — Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers — Wild and Scen…

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Sponsors: Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. (R‑NJ‑07) and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D‑NJ‑12) say the study advances conservation and local collaboration. [2]Office of Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. — Kean, Watson Coleman Introduce Bipartisan Bill…
  • Endorsements: Raritan Headwaters, The Nature Conservancy (NJ), NY/NJ Baykeeper, the Watershed Institute, Sourland Conservancy, and the New Jersey Conservation Foundation support the bill as a step toward community‑led river protection. [2]Office of Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. — Kean, Watson Coleman Introduce Bipartisan Bill…
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition is listed on the bill’s Congress.gov page as of October 30, 2025. [1]Congress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.5852 — 119th Congress (2025–2026): Upp…
  • Possible concerns seen in similar study bills: added federal review of certain federally assisted water projects during the study window (under Section 7 of the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act), and questions about local versus federal roles. [5]Congressional Research Service / Library of Congress — Section 7 of the Wild an…[6]U.S. National Park Service — What We Do — Wild and Scenic Rivers Program
05 · Section

What’s Next

Status: Introduced on October 28, 2025 and referred to the House Natural Resources Committee. Next steps could include a committee hearing and markup before any House vote; the Senate would then consider a companion measure if it advances. [1]Congress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.5852 — 119th Congress (2025–2026): Upp…

Sources cited
  1. [1] H.R.5852 — 119th Congress (2025–2026): Upper Raritan River Watershed Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025 Congress.gov / Library of Congress
  2. [2] Kean, Watson Coleman Introduce Bipartisan Bill Advancing Conservation for Upper Raritan River Office of Rep. Thomas Kean Jr.
  3. [3] Eligible and Suitable — Wild and Scenic Rivers Program U.S. National Park Service
  4. [4] Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers — Wild and Scenic Rivers Program U.S. National Park Service
  5. [5] Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief (CRS Report) Congressional Research Service / Library of Congress
  6. [6] What We Do — Wild and Scenic Rivers Program U.S. National Park Service

Discussion