119-HR-5911 Journalist Public Summary
119 · HR 5911 Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act
Public Lands and Natural Resources
Crystal Reservoir Conveyance ActThis bill directs the Forest Service to convey specified property and water rights in Ouray County, Colorado, to the City of Ouray, Colorado, for use as open...
H.R. 5911 would transfer Crystal Reservoir and about 45 acres of nearby Forest Service land—and associated water rights—to the City of Ouray, CO, while requiring permanent free public access, limiting development, and shifting dam upkeep to the city; as of April 21, 2026, it has been ordered reported out of committee and awaits House floor action.
01 · Section
Public Summary — H.R. 5911, “Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act”
A quick, plain‑English explainer of what this bill would do, why it matters, who supports or opposes it, and what happens next.
- Headline Summary: Move Crystal Reservoir and roughly 45 surrounding acres from federal (Forest Service) to local control by the City of Ouray, with strings attached to keep it open to the public and noncommercial.
- What It Does: Directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture to convey the reservoir, Full Moon Dam and related infrastructure, and associated water rights to Ouray. The city must: maintain the land as open space with free public recreation access; allow federal easements for existing roads and trails; avoid new development or commercial uses except what’s needed to operate and maintain the reservoir and dam; and protect upstream wetlands from being harmed by any expansion. Ouray assumes ongoing repair/operations costs; most conveyance costs are federal, but the city pays for needed surveys. If terms aren’t followed, the land can revert to the United States at the Secretary’s discretion. Water rights remain governed by Colorado law, and the Red Mountain Ditch can continue to deliver water to the reservoir.
- Who’s For It: The sponsor, Rep. Jeff Hurd (R‑CO). Supporters generally argue this puts management closer to the community that relies on the water, secures local storage for drought planning, and locks in free public access for fishing and other recreation while clarifying maintenance responsibilities.
- Who’s Against It: Skeptics of transferring federal land to local control, who worry about precedent and long‑term stewardship; some conservation voices concerned about habitat and wetlands impacts (even with guardrails); and local taxpayers wary of inheriting dam repair liabilities. Water‑rights stakeholders could also scrutinize how releases and augmentation interact with downstream users under state law.
- What’s Next: On April 21, 2026, the House Natural Resources Committee discharged the Federal Lands Subcommittee, held a markup, and ordered the bill reported in the nature of a substitute by unanimous consent. Next step: consideration by the full House. If it passes, it heads to the Senate and then, if approved, to the President.
- Tone: Neutral, factual, and easy to read—aimed at a neighbor who doesn’t follow Congress closely.
Acres of federal land to be conveyed
45acres
Year introduced
2025
Referenced water‑rights decree year
1942
Discussion