Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · S 2283 Public Summary

119-S-2283 Journalist Public Summary

119 · S 2283 A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office".

settings Government Operations and Politics
This bill designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office".

S. 2283 would rename the Guthrie, OK post office at 201 W. Oklahoma Ave as the “Oscar J. Upham Post Office,” honoring a local Medal of Honor recipient and longtime postal worker; it passed the Senate on October 9, 2025 and now awaits House action. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…[2]Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation — Oklahoma Military Hall of Fame – Class…

Published
10 Oct 2025
Updated
10 Oct 2025
Tags
public-summary · postal-naming · Oklahoma
Vetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

A straightforward renaming: designate the Guthrie, Oklahoma post office as the “Oscar J. Upham Post Office,” which the Senate approved on October 9, 2025. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…

02 · Section

What It Does

The bill changes the official name of the U.S. Postal Service facility at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, OK to the “Oscar J. Upham Post Office.” It’s an honorary designation that updates legal references and signage; it doesn’t alter postal services. The namesake, Oscar J. Upham, was a Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipient who later worked as a mail carrier in Guthrie for decades. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…[2]Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation — Oklahoma Military Hall of Fame – Class…

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Sen. James Lankford (R‑OK), sponsor; Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R‑OK), cosponsor. [3]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — All Info – S.2283 (cosponsor listing)
  • Senate action: Passed by unanimous consent, indicating no objections were recorded. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…[4]Senate Democratic Caucus — Wrap Up for Thursday, October 9, 2025
  • House companion bill H.R. 4836: led by Rep. Stephanie Bice (R‑OK‑5) with Oklahoma delegation cosponsors Tom Cole (OK‑4), Frank Lucas (OK‑3), Kevin Hern (OK‑1), and Josh Brecheen (OK‑2). [5]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — Cosponsors – H.R.4836 (Oscar J. Upham Post…
  • Rationale cited by supporters: honor a local Medal of Honor recipient and longtime postal employee tied to Guthrie’s history. [2]Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation — Oklahoma Military Hall of Fame – Class…
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • No formal opposition noted; the Senate approved the bill without amendment by unanimous consent. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…[6]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — Amendments – S.2283
05 · Section

What’s Next

After Senate passage on October 9, 2025, S. 2283 moves to the House. A matching House bill (H.R. 4836) is currently referred to the House Oversight committee; if the House passes either version, the measure would go to the President for signature. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congres…[7]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — All Info – H.R.4836 (House companion)

Sources cited
  1. [1] S.2283 text (Engrossed in Senate), Congress.gov Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  2. [2] Oklahoma Military Hall of Fame – Class of 2025 (includes Oscar J. Upham profile) Oklahoma Military Heritage Foundation
  3. [3] All Info – S.2283 (cosponsor listing) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  4. [4] Wrap Up for Thursday, October 9, 2025 Senate Democratic Caucus
  5. [5] Cosponsors – H.R.4836 (Oscar J. Upham Post Office) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  6. [6] Amendments – S.2283 Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  7. [7] All Info – H.R.4836 (House companion) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)

Discussion