Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HRES 906 Public Summary

119-HRES-906 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HRES 906 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a supermajority vote of Members present and voting to subject a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner to the censure or disapproval of the House, or removal from committee membership.

A bipartisan House resolution would raise the bar to punish Members: it requires at least 60% of those voting to censure a lawmaker, issue a formal disapproval, or remove them from committees; it’s currently in the House Rules Committee. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — Text — H.Res.906 (Introduced in House) | C…[2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | C…

Published
25 Nov 2025
Updated
25 Nov 2025
Tags
Public Summary · U.S. House · Rules Change
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

Make it harder to punish lawmakers: H.Res. 906 would require at least 60% of Members present and voting to censure a colleague, formally disapprove of conduct, or remove them from committee assignments. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — Text — H.Res.906 (Introduced in House) | C…

02 · Section

What It Does

In plain terms, this proposal changes House rules so that censuring a Member (a formal reprimand), issuing a House “disapproval,” or removing a Member from any committee would need a supermajority—specifically, 60% of those voting when a quorum is present. Today, such actions can pass with a simple majority. [1]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — Text — H.Res.906 (Introduced in House) | C…[2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | C…

Supporters frame this as a guardrail against rapid‑fire, partisan punishment; the change aims to ensure such penalties happen only when there’s meaningful bipartisan buy‑in. Recent weeks saw multiple censure efforts, underscoring why backers say a higher bar is needed. [3]Time — What to Know About This Week's Flurry of Censure Fights in the House | T…

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Lead sponsors: Rep. Don Beyer (D‑VA) and Rep. Don Bacon (R‑NE) introduced the measure, arguing the current cycle of censures “impair[s] our ability to work together” and that a higher threshold would restore sanity to the process. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | C…[4]Axios — Scoop: House members want to make it harder to censure each other | Axi…
  • Bipartisan cosponsors: Dozens from both parties signed on at introduction (28 cosponsors listed), signaling cross‑party interest in dialing down tit‑for‑tat punishments. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | C…
  • House leadership openness: Speaker Mike Johnson (R‑LA) said he’s open to raising the censure threshold; Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D‑NY) called himself open‑minded about reforms. [5]Fox News — Johnson considers raising threshold for House censure resolutions |…[6]CNN Newsource (syndicated via KEYT) — Bipartisan push to reform censure process…
  • Additional backing in press: Members told reporters they want to prevent a "censure death spiral," and some—across factions—say supermajority support should be required for such serious discipline. [4]Axios — Scoop: House members want to make it harder to censure each other | Axi…[3]Time — What to Know About This Week's Flurry of Censure Fights in the House | T…
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • Skeptics on the right: Conservative commentators argue raising the bar would shield misconduct and reduce accountability rather than fix partisanship. [7]RedState — Dems Want to Make It Harder to Censure Them; They Should Stop Doing…
  • Some hard‑liners who favor swift censures have criticized recent moves to slow or sideline censure votes—suggesting they may resist a higher threshold. (Inference based on their public objections during the latest censure fights.) [8]The Guardian — House Republicans' attempt to censure Plaskett fails | The Guard…
05 · Section

Why It Matters

The House has recently spent significant floor time on censures and related penalties—far more than in the past—fueling accusations of political point‑scoring. Backers say requiring 60% would reserve punishment for the most serious cases and curb partisan escalation. [3]Time — What to Know About This Week's Flurry of Censure Fights in the House | T…

06 · Section

What’s Next

Status as of November 25, 2025: H.Res. 906 was introduced on November 21 and referred to the House Committee on Rules; no further action is posted yet. If the committee reports it, the full House would vote on whether to adopt the rule change. [2]Congress.gov (Library of Congress) — H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | C…

Sources cited
  1. [1] Text — H.Res.906 (Introduced in House) | Congress.gov (Library of Congress) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  2. [2] H.Res.906 — Overview, Sponsor, Actions | Congress.gov (Library of Congress) Congress.gov (Library of Congress)
  3. [3] What to Know About This Week's Flurry of Censure Fights in the House | TIME Time
  4. [4] Scoop: House members want to make it harder to censure each other | Axios Axios
  5. [5] Johnson considers raising threshold for House censure resolutions | Fox News Fox News
  6. [6] Bipartisan push to reform censure process emerges after flurry of complaints | CNN Newsource via KEYT CNN Newsource (syndicated via KEYT)
  7. [7] Dems Want to Make It Harder to Censure Them; They Should Stop Doing Things Worthy of It Instead | RedState (opinion) RedState
  8. [8] House Republicans' attempt to censure Plaskett fails | The Guardian The Guardian

Discussion