Analyses / Impact Analysis / 119 · HR 5713 Impact Analysis

119-HR-5713 Investigative Journalist Impact Analysis

119 · HR 5713 Expedited Removal of Criminal Aliens Act

Bottom-line assessment
Overall stance (analytical)
Implied adult detention bed rate (appropriated)
169USD/day
Beds funded (FY25 House bill)
50000beds
ICE Air charter average cost
8577USD per flight‑hour
U.S. immigration court pending caseload (end FY24)
3600000cases
Published
21 Nov 2025
Updated
21 Nov 2025
Tags
Impact Analysis · Immigration · Expedited Removal
Unvetted
01 · Section

Summary

What the bill changes and why it matters

The bill adds INA §238A to mandate detention and authorize expedited removal for noncitizens identified as gang members, members/supporters of designated foreign terrorist organizations, or those convicted of listed offenses, while barring withholding of removal under the INA. This leverages and broadens existing expedited mechanisms beyond aggravated felonies under §238, shifting adjudication out of standard §240 proceedings for targeted categories. [1]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 U.S. Code § 1228 - Expedited removal…

Key constraints persist: judicial review of expedited removal remains limited post‑Thuraissigiam; CAT-based protection cannot be eliminated and would still require deferral where torture is more likely than not; and post‑order detention is constrained by the Zadvydas six‑month reasonableness presumption when removal is not reasonably foreseeable. These legal guardrails temper any net acceleration and add cost/complexity for screening and custody. [8]Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center — Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissi…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 - Withholding of rem…[4]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 208.17 - Deferral of removal…[5]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)…

02 · Section

Key metrics

Implied adult detention bed rate (appropriated)
169USD/day
Beds funded (FY25 House bill)
50000beds
ICE Air charter average cost
8577USD per flight‑hour
U.S. immigration court pending caseload (end FY24)
3600000cases
FY25 case completions to date (EOIR release, 11 months)
722000cases
03 · Section

Economic Effects

Direct fiscal outlays and operational shifts

  • Detention spending would rise with mandatory custody for broader categories. The House FY25 bill funds 50,000 beds at roughly $3.08B, implying ~$169 per detainee‑day; expanded expedited removal for targeted groups increases utilization pressure on these beds. [9]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-553 — DHS Appropriations Bill, 2025 (House Committe…
  • Air transport costs scale with removals. ICE charter flights average $8,577/hour; when military lift is used, per‑person costs have been several times higher, suggesting that modality choices materially affect total removal costs. [10]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE Air Operations prioritizes safet…[11]Reuters — U.S. military deportation flight likely cost more than first class
  • Court workload may shift rather than disappear. Covered cases can bypass §240 hearings, easing some EOIR congestion, but credible‑fear/CAT screenings, custody reviews, and federal habeas or APA suits (on classification or process) can offset savings. [8]Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center — Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissi…
  • Data and contracting risks persist. GAO has flagged ICE detention and reporting weaknesses, including understating populations and oversight gaps (e.g., restrictive housing), which can drive inefficiencies and liability. [14]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-106233: Immigration Enforcement—…[15]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-107494: Restrictive Housing—Acti…
  • Facility mix affects cost: high‑cost sites (e.g., emergency/tent complexes) have far higher per‑diem rates than the national average, magnifying fiscal exposure if capacity surges rely on such options. [16]Washington Post — Inside ‘Alligator Alcatraz’: detainee conditions at a Florida…
04 · Section

Social Effects

Impacts on communities and due‑process risk

  • Community safety trade‑offs. Police data from large cities show drops in crime reporting among Hispanic residents during heightened immigration enforcement periods, indicating potential chilling effects that can hinder investigations. [17]Houston Public Media — Houston Police Department press conference coverage on r…[18]Los Angeles Police Department — LAPD: Decline in Reporting of Crime Among Hispa…
  • Classification accuracy concerns. Error‑prone gang databases (e.g., California’s CalGang audit found infants erroneously listed and documentation gaps) raise the risk that expedited removal could be triggered by inaccurate designations. [6]California State Auditor — California State Auditor Report 2015‑130 – CalGang a…
  • Wrongful‑person risk is non‑zero. GAO identified hundreds of ICE detainers issued for potential U.S. citizens (2015–2020), underscoring the need for robust identity verification before applying mandatory detention/expedited removal. [7]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-21-487: Immigration Enforcement—Act…
  • Conditions and custody practices. GAO tallied nearly 15,000 restrictive‑housing placements in ICE facilities (FY17–FY21), and press reporting has documented poor conditions at rapid‑build detention sites—factors that can affect health outcomes and spur litigation/oversight. [15]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-107494: Restrictive Housing—Acti…[16]Washington Post — Inside ‘Alligator Alcatraz’: detainee conditions at a Florida…
  • Terrorism‑related support is broad in law; DHS/State maintain TRIG exemptions for limited/duress support. Applying expedited removal to all who “provided material support” risks sweeping in exemptible cases unless guidance aligns with existing TRIG practices. [19]U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — USCIS: TRIG—Situational Exemptions…
  • Public‑safety targeting vs. breadth. ICE reports thousands of gang‑member removals annually, but agency statistics also show many arrests/removals involve non‑violent offenses, so net community effects depend on how narrowly the bill is implemented. [20]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE FY2023 Year in Review (gang memb…[21]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE releases Fiscal Year 2024 Annual…
05 · Section

Environmental Effects

Footprint of expanded detention and removals

  • More removal flights marginally add to U.S. aviation emissions; FAA notes civil aircraft account for about 2% of total U.S. carbon pollution and around 9–11% of transportation‑sector CO₂. Increased reliance on charters/military lift raises fuel burn per mission. [22]Federal Aviation Administration — FAA final rule to reduce carbon pollution (co…[23]Congressional Research Service — CRS In Focus: Aviation, Air Pollution, and Cli…
  • Temporary or remote detention infrastructure can have local environmental impacts (waste, water, siting in sensitive areas), as seen in litigation and reporting around large tent complexes. [16]Washington Post — Inside ‘Alligator Alcatraz’: detainee conditions at a Florida…
  • Net system emissions effect is likely modest relative to national totals but directionally positive (higher) if removals and detainee transfers scale up without offsetting efficiencies. [10]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE Air Operations prioritizes safet…
06 · Section

Temporal Analysis

Short‑term vs. long‑term consequences

  1. Short term (0–12 months): Rapid increase in detention intake for covered categories; immediate demand for bed space and airlift; some relief to EOIR dockets for those cases, alongside upticks in screening, custody reviews, and classification challenges. [9]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-553 — DHS Appropriations Bill, 2025 (House Committe…[12]Congressional Research Service — CRS Insight: FY2024 EOIR Immigration Court Dat…
  2. Medium term (1–3 years): Litigation clarifies edges (e.g., evidentiary thresholds for “gang member,” interaction with TRIG exemptions, and CAT screenings). Facility build‑outs or high‑cost temporary sites drive budget variance. [19]U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — USCIS: TRIG—Situational Exemptions…[16]Washington Post — Inside ‘Alligator Alcatraz’: detainee conditions at a Florida…
  3. Long term (3+ years): Enduring obligations under CAT and Zadvydas mean a residual cohort faces prolonged—but bounded—custody where removal is not reasonably foreseeable; fiscal pressures incentivize better triage and verification to minimize erroneous detentions. [4]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 208.17 - Deferral of removal…[5]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)…
07 · Section

Unintended Consequences

Risks and second‑order effects flagged in prior research or oversight

  • Misclassification and overbreadth: reliance on error‑prone gang or watchlist data can trigger wrongful expedited removals, with downstream costs and rights violations. [6]California State Auditor — California State Auditor Report 2015‑130 – CalGang a…
  • Custody overhang: where repatriation is delayed or barred (e.g., no travel documents; risk of torture), mandatory detention collides with Zadvydas limits, producing cycles of custody and supervised release that neither remove nor fully release, increasing administrative burden. [5]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)…
  • Court‑shifted congestion: limited habeas/APA review after Thuraissigiam still leaves room for federal challenges on classification, CAT, or statutory interpretation, potentially moving workload from EOIR to Article III courts. [8]Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center — Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissi…
  • Procurement and oversight risk: GAO findings on detention reporting and restrictive housing indicate ongoing compliance gaps that can scale with expansion. [14]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-106233: Immigration Enforcement—…[15]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-107494: Restrictive Housing—Acti…
  • Community trust effects: reduced victim/witness cooperation in immigrant communities can undermine local public safety objectives, as documented in major city data during prior enforcement surges. [17]Houston Public Media — Houston Police Department press conference coverage on r…[18]Los Angeles Police Department — LAPD: Decline in Reporting of Crime Among Hispa…
  • Cost volatility: use of military airlift or contingency facilities can spike per‑capita costs compared with standard charters and long‑term contracts. [11]Reuters — U.S. military deportation flight likely cost more than first class
08 · Section

Assessment

Overall stance (analytical)

Neutral. The proposal likely accelerates removals for a defined set of noncitizens and shifts some caseload off immigration courts, but at the price of higher detention/transport costs and elevated due‑process and classification risks; binding CAT/Zadvydas constraints and oversight gaps further complicate net gains. Real‑world impact depends on narrow, evidence‑based implementation and alignment with existing TRIG/CAT frameworks. [9]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-553 — DHS Appropriations Bill, 2025 (House Committe…[10]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE Air Operations prioritizes safet…[8]Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center — Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissi…[4]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 208.17 - Deferral of removal…[5]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)…

09 · Section

Sourcing

Core sources underpinning the analysis

  • Statutes/regulations and Supreme Court: INA §238; withholding and CAT regulations; Thuraissigiam; Zadvydas. [1]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 U.S. Code § 1228 - Expedited removal…[3]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 - Withholding of rem…[4]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — 8 C.F.R. § 208.17 - Deferral of removal…[8]Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center — Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissi…[5]Legal Information Institute (Cornell) — Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)…
  • Budget/operations: House FY25 DHS Appropriations; ICE Air operations; GAO on ICE data and restrictive housing; EOIR/TRAC caseload. [9]Congress.gov — H. Rept. 118-553 — DHS Appropriations Bill, 2025 (House Committe…[10]U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE Air Operations prioritizes safet…[14]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-106233: Immigration Enforcement—…[15]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-24-107494: Restrictive Housing—Acti…[12]Congressional Research Service — CRS Insight: FY2024 EOIR Immigration Court Dat…
  • Community and classification risk: LAPD/HPD reporting trends; California State Auditor on gang databases; GAO on wrongful detainers. [18]Los Angeles Police Department — LAPD: Decline in Reporting of Crime Among Hispa…[17]Houston Public Media — Houston Police Department press conference coverage on r…[6]California State Auditor — California State Auditor Report 2015‑130 – CalGang a…[7]U.S. Government Accountability Office — GAO-21-487: Immigration Enforcement—Act…
  • Environmental context: FAA emissions share and rule. [22]Federal Aviation Administration — FAA final rule to reduce carbon pollution (co…
Sources cited
  1. [1] 8 U.S. Code § 1228 - Expedited removal of aliens convicted of committing aggravated felonies Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  2. [2] CRS Legal Sidebar: DHS’s Authority to Expand Expedited Removal Congressional Research Service
  3. [3] 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 - Withholding of removal and CAT standards Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  4. [4] 8 C.F.R. § 208.17 - Deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  5. [5] Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) – opinion Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
  6. [6] California State Auditor Report 2015‑130 – CalGang audit results California State Auditor
  7. [7] GAO-21-487: Immigration Enforcement—Actions Needed to Better Track Cases Involving U.S. Citizenship Investigations U.S. Government Accountability Office
  8. [8] Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. ___ (2020) Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
  9. [9] H. Rept. 118-553 — DHS Appropriations Bill, 2025 (House Committee Report) Congress.gov
  10. [10] ICE Air Operations prioritizes safety and security for its passengers (cost data) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  11. [11] U.S. military deportation flight likely cost more than first class Reuters
  12. [12] CRS Insight: FY2024 EOIR Immigration Court Data—Caseloads and Backlog Congressional Research Service
  13. [13] EOIR press release: Significant Immigration Court Milestones (Sep. 4, 2025) U.S. Department of Justice
  14. [14] GAO-24-106233: Immigration Enforcement—Arrests, Removals, and Detentions Varied Over Time and ICE Should Strengthen Data Reporting U.S. Government Accountability Office
  15. [15] GAO-24-107494: Restrictive Housing—Actions Needed to Enhance BOP and ICE Management and Oversight U.S. Government Accountability Office
  16. [16] Inside ‘Alligator Alcatraz’: detainee conditions at a Florida Everglades site Washington Post
  17. [17] Houston Police Department press conference coverage on reporting declines (2017) Houston Public Media
  18. [18] LAPD: Decline in Reporting of Crime Among Hispanic Population (2017) Los Angeles Police Department
  19. [19] USCIS: TRIG—Situational Exemptions (material support under duress/limited support) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
  20. [20] ICE FY2023 Year in Review (gang member removals noted) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  21. [21] ICE releases Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
  22. [22] FAA final rule to reduce carbon pollution (context on aviation share of emissions) Federal Aviation Administration
  23. [23] CRS In Focus: Aviation, Air Pollution, and Climate Change (IF11696) Congressional Research Service

Discussion