Analyses / Public Summary / 119 · HR 2270 Public Summary

119-HR-2270 Journalist Public Summary

119 · HR 2270 Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions Act

work Labor and Employment
Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions ActThis bill excludes the value of employer-funded child or dependent care from being used in calculating an eligible employee's overtime pay.Under...

H.R. 2270 would change how overtime is calculated by excluding employer-provided or reimbursed child and dependent care from a worker’s “regular rate,” with supporters saying this encourages more caregiving benefits and opponents warning it could trim some workers’ overtime pay. It was reported out of the House Education and the Workforce Committee and placed on the Union Calendar on December 18, 2025; next step is possible House floor action.

Published
19 Dec 2025
Updated
19 Dec 2025
Tags
Public Summary · 119th Congress · FLSA
Unvetted
01 · Section

Headline Summary

Keeps employer-paid child and elder care benefits out of the overtime pay calculation, aiming to spur more caregiving support at work while potentially lowering some overtime totals for workers who receive those benefits.

02 · Section

What It Does

The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act so that the value of employer-provided or reimbursed child or dependent care would not be counted in a worker’s “regular rate” used to compute time-and-a-half overtime. In short: if your employer helps pay for child or elder care, that amount would no longer boost the base used to calculate your overtime. The change would take effect for workweeks beginning on or after the date the bill becomes law.

03 · Section

Who’s For It

  • Sponsors: Rep. Mark Messmer (R-IN) with Reps. John Moolenaar (R-MI), Ashley Hinson (R-IA), and Josh Harder (D-CA).
  • Supporters’ case: Removing these costs from overtime math could encourage more employers—especially small and mid-sized firms—to offer child and elder care support, helping working parents and family caregivers stay in the workforce and reducing turnover.
  • House action: The House Education and the Workforce Committee advanced the bill (ordered reported on April 9, 2025).
04 · Section

Who’s Against It

  • Worker and labor critics’ concern (in general terms): Excluding more items from the “regular rate” can shrink overtime pay for affected employees, especially those who regularly work long hours.
  • Equity worry: Benefits would help only those whose employers choose to offer them; workers without access could see no gain while others might see modest overtime reductions.
  • Policy alternative often suggested: Keep caregiving help but offset costs through tax credits or direct subsidies, rather than changing overtime calculations.
05 · Section

What’s Next

Status as of December 18, 2025: Reported (amended) by the House Education and the Workforce Committee and placed on the Union Calendar (No. 359). Next, House leaders may schedule floor debate and a vote. If it passes the House, it moves to the Senate; to become law, both chambers must pass the same text and the President must sign it (or Congress must override a veto).

Discussion