119-HRES-1038 Journalist Public Summary
A House-only resolution reaffirming support for the Fourteenth Amendment—birthright citizenship, due process, and equal protection—opposing efforts to weaken those guarantees, and urging all levels of government to defend them; currently in the House Judiciary Committee after introduction on February 4, 2026.
Headline Summary
House Resolution to reaffirm the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantees—birthright citizenship, due process, and equal protection—and to oppose any efforts to weaken them.
What It Does
This is a nonbinding “sense of the House” measure. It states that the Fourteenth Amendment is central to American democracy and calls on Congress and all branches of the federal government to defend its protections. It specifically urges preserving birthright citizenship and rejecting policies that would erode due process or equal protection, and it expresses support for communities and civic groups working to ensure equal treatment under the law.
Who’s For It
- Sponsored by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).
- Initial Democratic co-sponsors include Jim Costa, Angie Craig, Dwight Evans (PA), Summer Lee (PA), Stephen Lynch, Seth Moulton, Ilhan Omar, Delia Ramirez, Melanie Stansbury, Ayanna Pressley, and Gilbert ("Mr.") Cisneros.
- Supporters frame it as a needed recommitment to constitutional guarantees—especially birthright citizenship, due process, and equal protection—and a response to recent attempts to narrow those rights.
Who’s Against It
No formal opposition is listed in the resolution text. In similar debates, critics—often from the Republican side—argue that such measures are symbolic rather than substantive, may pre-judge constitutional disputes, or conflict with proposals to limit birthright citizenship or tighten immigration and voting rules. These are points to watch as the measure is considered.
What’s Next
Status: Introduced on February 4, 2026, and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. Next potential steps are a hearing and committee markup. If the House adopts it, the resolution would state the chamber’s position but would not change any law or require action by the Senate or the President.
Discussion